Contact allergy to hair colouring products The cosmetovigilance experience of 4 companies (2003-2006)

被引:19
作者
Krasteva, Maya [1 ]
Bons, Brigitte [1 ]
Tozer, Sarah [2 ]
Rich, Kim [2 ]
Hoting, Edo [3 ]
Hollenberg, Detlef [3 ]
Fuchs, Anne [4 ]
Fautz, Rolf [4 ]
机构
[1] LOreal Res & Dev, F-92600 Asnieres, France
[2] P&G Tech Ctr, Surrey TW20 9NW, England
[3] Henkel AG & Co KGaA, D-40589 Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] KPSS Kao Profess Salon Serv, D-64297 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
allergic contact dermatitis; black henna tattoos; cosmetovigilance; hair colouring products; undesirable events; BLACK HENNA TATTOOS; ADVERSE SKIN REACTIONS; P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC DATA; CONSUMER ALLERGY; DERMATITIS; COSMETICS; DYE; SENSITIZATION; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1684/ejd.2010.0808
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
The post-marketing undesirable events to hair colouring products in the European Union notified to the cosmetovigilance departments of four major cosmetic companies were analysed (2003-2006). The objective was to determine whether there was any time effect (trend to increase or decrease), country effect (significant difference between the countries included in the analysis) or product type effect (direct or oxidation), as well as to identify risk factors. Alleged undesirable events (UEvs, all notifications prior to causality assessment), were compared to the respective undesirable effects (UEfs, reasonably attributable to product use). A detailed analysis was performed on notifications with manifestations compatible with allergic contact dermatitis. No time effect of UEvs and UEfs was shown, for all hair-dye associated notifications and for allergic contact dermatitis, for all hair colouring products together and by product type. The incidence of allergic contact dermatitis to direct hair colouring products was lower for all four companies compared to oxidative hair dyes. The reporting rates of UEfs were statistically higher in the UK for one of four companies. Past history of black henna tattoos appeared as a major risk factor for seriousness of allergic contact reactions.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ABBADI NH, 2008, 17 EADV C PAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, COLIPA GUIDELINES MA
[3]  
BERNE B, 1994, EUR J DERMATOL, V4, P189
[4]   Can the reporting of adverse skin reactions to cosmetics be improved?: A prospective clinical study using a structured protocol [J].
Berne, Berit ;
Tammela, Monica ;
Farm, Gunilla ;
Inerot, Annica ;
Lindberg, Magnus .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2008, 58 (04) :223-227
[5]  
Brancaccio Ronald R, 2002, Am J Contact Dermat, V13, P15, DOI 10.1053/ajcd.2002.30466
[6]  
Coenraads P-J, 2007, Eur J Dermatol, V17, P564
[7]   Cosmetovigilance survey: Are cosmetics considered safe by consumers? [J].
Di Giovanni, C ;
Arcoraci, V ;
Gambardella, L ;
Sautebin, L .
PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 53 (01) :16-21
[8]   Frequency of dermatoses associated with cosmetics [J].
Duarte, Ida ;
Campos Lage, Ana Carolina .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2007, 56 (04) :211-213
[9]   Hair-dye allergy: a coloured case [J].
Hink, E ;
de Winter, JP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2006, 165 (03) :195-196
[10]   p-Phenylenediamine in black henna tattoos -: A practice in need of policy in children [J].
Jacob, Sharon E. ;
Zapolanski, Tamar ;
Chayavichitsilp, Pamela ;
Connelly, Elizabeth Alvarez ;
Eichenfield, Lawrence F. .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2008, 162 (08) :790-792