Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Common Research Model Wing-Body-Tail Configuration

被引:72
作者
Chen, Song [1 ]
Lyu, Zhoujie [1 ]
Kenway, Gaetan K. W. [1 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2016年 / 53卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AEROSTRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; ADJOINT FORMULATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; PARALLEL COMPUTERS; AIRCRAFT; MINIMIZATION; TRANSPORT; STABILITY; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.2514/1.C033328
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Wing shape is one of the main drivers of aircraft aerodynamic performance, so most aerodynamic shape optimization efforts have focused solely on the wing. However, the performance of the full aircraft configuration must account for the fact that the aircraft needs to be trimmed. Thus, to realize the full benefit of aerodynamic shape optimization, one should optimize the wing shape while including the full configuration and a trim constraint. To evaluate the benefit of this approach, we perform the aerodynamic shape optimization of the Common Research Model wing-body-tail configuration using gradient-based optimization with a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes model that includes a discrete adjoint implementation. We investigate the aerodynamic shape optimization of the wing with a trim constraint that is satisfied by rotating the horizontal tail. We then optimize the same wing-body configuration without the tail but with an added trim drag penalty based on a surrogate model we created before the optimization. The drag coefficient is minimized subject to lift and trim constraints. We found that considering the trim during optimization is a better approach than using a fixed-wing moment constraint. We also show that the trim drag surrogate model we created yields a minimum drag coefficient that is within 1.2 counts of the minimum drag coefficient obtained by rotating the tail to satisfy the trim constraint. However, we recommend rotating the tail within the optimization process to obtain the best possible performance.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 293
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, 19811259 AIAA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 52 AER SCI M NATL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 20086919 AIAA
[4]  
Balay S, 1997, MODERN SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, P163
[5]  
Balay S., 2013, ANL9511 TR
[6]   Continuous Adjoint Approach for the Spalart-Allmaras Model in Aerodynamic Optimization [J].
Bueno-Orovio, Alfonso ;
Castro, Carlos ;
Palacios, Francisco ;
Zuazua, Enrique .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2012, 50 (03) :631-646
[7]   Single-point and multipoint aerodynamic shape optimization of high-speed civil transport [J].
Cliff, SE ;
Reuther, JJ ;
Saunders, DA ;
Hicks, RM .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2001, 38 (06) :997-1005
[8]   SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization [J].
Gill, PE ;
Murray, W ;
Saunders, MA .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2002, 12 (04) :979-1006
[9]   Induced-Drag Minimization of Nonplanar Geometries Based on the Euler Equations [J].
Hicken, Jason E. ;
Zingg, David W. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (11) :2564-2575
[10]  
Jameson A., 1988, Journal of Scientific Computing, V3, P233, DOI 10.1007/BF01061285