Austrian economics without extreme apriorism: A critical reply

被引：4
作者：
Lipski, Jonas [1 ]
机构：
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, GRK Integrating Eth & Epistemol Sci 2073, Deutsch Forsch Gemeinschaft, Hannover, Germany
来源：
SYNTHESE | 2021年 / 199卷 / 3-4期
关键词：
Austrian economics; Philosophy of economics; Praxeology; Critical rationalism;
D O I：
10.1007/s11229-021-03249-7
中图分类号：
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号：
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要：
In this paper I will analyze and criticize Linsbichler's recent proposition to interpret the fundamental axiom of Praxeology as analytic. I will first describe Linsbichler's problem situation. I will then describe and criticize Linsbichler's proposed solution to his problem; namely his interpretation of the fundamental axiom as analytic. I will argue that this idea does not fully utilize critical potentials that are available to improve the fundamental axiom. I will propose an alternative interpretation which I call the 'critical interpretation' that conserves the progressive aspects of Linsbichler's proposal while eliminating undesirable ones.
引用
收藏
页码：10331 / 10341
页数：11
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Albert H., 2010, TREATISE CRITICAL RE
  • [2] Bartley W.W., 1962, RETREAT COMMITMENT, V2nd
  • [3] Blaug M., 1980, METHODOLOGY EC EC EX
  • [4] Di Iorio F, 2008, NUOVA CIVILTA MACCHI
  • [5] Hayek F., 1952, SENSORY ORDER
  • [6] Hayek F.A., 1988, COLLECTED WORKS FA H
  • [7] Hayek F A. von., 2003, Law, legislation and liberty: a new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy
  • [8] Linsbichler A., 2017, WAS LUDWIG MISES CON, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46170-0]
  • [9] Austrian economics without extreme apriorism: construing the fundamental axiom of praxeology as analytic
    Linsbichler, Alexander
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2021, 198 (SUPPL 14) : 3359 - 3390
  • [10] Mantzavinos C., 2018, EXPLANATORY PLURALIS
12