Inhibition of the histamine-induced weal and flare response: a valid surrogate measure for antihistamine clinical efficacy?

被引:25
作者
Devillier, P.
Bousquet, J.
机构
[1] Hop Foch, UPRES, EA220, Biol Clin, F-92150 Suresnes, France
[2] Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02662.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Histamine plays a central role in allergic responses. Inhibition of the weal and flare response to histamine is a traditional pharmacodynamic tool to measure the activity of H-1-receptor antagonists. The time course and duration of cutaneous weal and flare inhibition are often used as surrogate measures of clinical efficacy. Pharmacodynamic differences among antihistamines are often interpreted to indicate differences in clinical efficacy. A systematic review of literature from 1980 to 2006 regarding the histamine induced weal and flare was undertaken. Search terms included 'histamine', 'skin test', 'weal', 'flare', and 'antihistamine'; retrieved articles were searched for relevant studies not identified initially. Data from human studies on the inhibition of the weal and flare by second-generation antihistamines were extracted and assessed. A literature search from 1980 to 2006 was undertaken for comparative studies of second-generation antihistamines in the clinical settings of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria; data extracted from these studies underwent systematic review. Differences were noted among second-generation antihistamines in terms of their ability to inhibit the histamine-induced weal and flare. Corresponding differences in terms of clinical efficacy in AR and chronic urticaria were not identified following a systematic review. The reasons for the disconnect between pharmacodynamic effects and clinical efficacy may include differences between the route and concentration of histamine, the involvement of mediators other than histamine in the allergic response, and the short time course of pharmacodynamic studies. The histamine-induced weal and flare response is a pharmacodynamic test that should not be used to compare the clinical efficacy of different antihistamines, and is not an adequate alternative to clinical end-point assessments in AR or chronic idiopathic urticaria.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 414
页数:15
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]   A parallel-group comparison of astemizole and loratadine for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis [J].
AlMuhaimeed, H .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (04) :175-181
[2]   CETIRIZINE VS ASTEMIZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC URTICARIA [J].
ALOMAR, A ;
DELACUADRA, J ;
FERNANDEZ, J .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 18 (05) :358-365
[3]  
BACKHOUSE CI, 1987, BRIT J CLIN PRACT, V41, P995
[4]  
BACKHOUSE CI, 1990, BRIT J CLIN PRACT, V44, P88
[5]   A new tool to evaluate the impact of chronic urticaria on quality of life:: chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) [J].
Baiardini, I ;
Pasquali, M ;
Braido, F ;
Fumagalli, F ;
Guerra, L ;
Compalati, E ;
Braga, M ;
Lombardi, C ;
Fassio, O ;
Canonica, GW .
ALLERGY, 2005, 60 (08) :1073-1078
[6]   A study comparing the inhibitory effects of single and repeated oral doses of ebastine and fexofenadine against histamine-induced skin reactivity [J].
Barbanoj, MJ ;
Antonijoan, RM ;
García-Cea, C ;
Morte, A ;
Gich, I ;
Gispert, J ;
Garcia, E ;
Esbrí, R ;
Luria, X .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 132 (03) :263-267
[7]   Allergic rhinitis: Broader disease effects and implications for management [J].
Baroody, FM .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 128 (05) :616-631
[8]  
BASOMBA A, 1993, ALLERGY, V48, P71
[9]  
Bayramgürler D, 1999, CLIN EXP DERMATOL, V24, P407
[10]  
BELAICH S, 1990, ANN ALLERGY, V64, P191