A study of the efficacy of bacterial biofilm cleanout for gastrointestinal endoscopes

被引:24
作者
Fang, Ying [1 ]
Shen, Zhe [1 ]
Li, Lan [1 ]
Cao, Yong [1 ]
Gu, Li-Ying [1 ]
Gu, Qing [1 ]
Zhong, Xiao-Qi [1 ]
Yu, Chao-Hui [1 ]
Li, You-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Coll Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Endoscopy; Escherichia coli biofilm; Scanning electron microscopy; Bacterial count; CLEANING EFFICACY; PREVENTION; INFECTION; REMOVAL; WATER;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.1019
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To compare the influence and clearance effect of enzymatic and non-enzymatic detergents against Escherichia coli (E. coli) biofilm on the inner surface of gastroscopes. METHODS: Teflon tubes were incubated in a mixture of different detergents and E coli culture (10(6) CFU/mL) for 72 h at 15 degrees C, and biofilms on the inner surface of the teflon tubes were analyzed by bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy. To evaluate the clearance effect of detergents, after biofilms were formed on the inner surface of Teflon tubes by 72 h lavage with E. coli culture, tubes were lavaged by enzymatic and non-enzymatic detergents at a speed of 250 mL/min, then biofilms on the inner surface were analyzed by bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Non-enzymatic detergent had a better inhibition function on biofilm formation than enzymatic detergent as it reduced bacterial burden by 2.4 log compared with the control samples (P = 0.00). Inhibition function of enzymatic detergent was not significantly different to that of control samples and reduced bacterial burden by 0.2 log on average (P > 0.05). After lavaging at 250 mL/min for 3 min, no living bacteria were left in the tubes. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed biofilms became very loose by the high shear force effect. CONCLUSION: Non-enzymatic detergent has a better inhibition effect on biofilm formation at room temperature. High speed pre-lavage and detergents are very important in temporal formed biofilm elimination. (C) 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1024
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Alvarado CJ, 2000, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V28, P138
[2]  
Bloss R, 2004, J HOSP INFECT, V56, pS44, DOI [10.1016/j.jhin.20032.12.029, 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.029]
[3]   Slimebusters [J].
Chicurel, M .
NATURE, 2000, 408 (6810) :284-286
[4]  
Chu N S, 2000, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V10, P233
[5]   Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine [J].
Cochran, WL ;
McFeters, GA ;
Stewart, PS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 88 (01) :22-30
[6]   Biofilms and device-associated infections [J].
Donlan, RM .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 7 (02) :277-281
[7]   Biofilms: Their impact on health and their recalcitrance toward biocides [J].
Gilbert, P ;
McBain, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2001, 29 (04) :252-255
[8]   Microbial biofilms: Their development and significance for medical device-related infections [J].
Habash, M ;
Reid, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 39 (09) :887-898
[9]   Water, water everywhere nor any a sterile drop to rinse your endoscope [J].
MacKay, WG ;
Leanord, AT ;
Williams, CL .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2002, 51 (04) :256-261
[10]   Using an efficient biofilm detaching agent: an essential step for the improvement of endoscope reprocessing protocols [J].
Marion, K. ;
Freney, J. ;
James, G. ;
Bergeron, E. ;
Renaud, F. N. R. ;
Costerton, J. W. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2006, 64 (02) :136-142