A scoping review of end user involvement in disability research

被引:35
作者
Joss, Nerida [1 ,2 ]
Cooklin, Amanda [1 ,3 ]
Oldenburg, Brian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Judith Lumley Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Disability; User involvement; Neurotrauma; End user; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; HEALTH-SERVICES; AGENDA; PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; PRIORITIES; PARTNERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.10.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Involving clients and consumers of health care in research, policy and health service development has been widely advocated for across a number of different fields and disciplines. Despite some promising evidence, 'end users' have not been meaningfully involved in all stages of the research process in the area of disability research. Objective: To conduct a scoping review on end user involvement in disability research, service and policy development. Methods: Literature was searched using electronic databases, hand searching reference lists of papers and grey literature. Electronic databases searched included the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. The search was restricted to articles published in English between January 2000 and April 2013. Results: Two clear themes emerged from a review of twenty-seven articles. Firstly, end users can benefit research as 'experts of experience' through their role as a co-researcher. Secondly, evidence suggests end users add value at different stages of the research process in this role. However, less is understood about end user involvement in the latter stages of the research process. Conclusions: This review suggests that end users can meaningfully contribute to the quality of disability research. End users are likely to engage in research with differing perspectives, desires to be involved at distinct stages of the process, differing roles and different abilities to participate in the research. Academic rigor, however, must be maintained by the researcher. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 196
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries
    Abma, TA
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (10) : 1310 - 1328
  • [2] Patients as Partners in Responsive Research: Methodological Notions for Collaborations in Mixed Research Teams
    Abma, Tineke A.
    Nierse, Christi J.
    Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2009, 19 (03) : 401 - 415
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, COMMUNITY BASED PART
  • [4] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • [5] Beresford P., 2002, SOCIAL POLICY SOC, V1, P95, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S1474746402000222, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746402000222]
  • [6] Beresford P, 2007, EVID POLICY, V3, P327
  • [7] Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda
    Boote, J
    Telford, R
    Cooper, C
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2002, 61 (02) : 213 - 236
  • [8] Bourke JA., 2012, ETHN INEQUAL HLTH SO, V5, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1108/17570981211286804, 10.1108/17570981211286804]
  • [9] C JONES EVANS., 2004, Research Policy and Planning, V22, P5
  • [10] The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice
    Cargo, Margaret
    Mercer, Shawna L.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 29 : 325 - 350