Validation of the Affect Integration Inventory in a sample of patients with personality disorders: A cross-sectional study

被引:4
作者
Frederiksen, Christina [1 ,4 ]
Solbakken, Ole Andre [2 ]
Licht, Rasmus W. [3 ,4 ]
Christensen, Ann-Eva [3 ]
Jorgensen, Carsten Rene [5 ]
Telleus, Gry Kjaersdam [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Psychiat Hosp, Clin North, Bronderslev, Denmark
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Psychol, Oslo, Norway
[3] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Psychiat, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Psychol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Aalborg Univ, Dept Commun & Psychol, Psychol, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Affect integration; Affect Integration Inventory; Affect consciousness; Personality disorder; Emotional dysfunction; AFFECT CONSCIOUSNESS; EMOTION REGULATION; AVOIDANT; SCHEMAS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103554
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Affect integration is defined as the capacity to comprehend emotional experiences as meaningful and to convert this knowledge into well-adjusted motivation, communication and behavior. Thus, affect integration is considered essential for personal adjustment and well-being, and it has been operationalized through the Affect Integration Inventory. However, the validity of this questionnaire has been examined only in non-clinical respondents. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in a sample of patients with personality disorders (n = 87). The internal structure and consistency were addressed using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. To determine aspects of convergent and discriminant validity, the correlations between the scores on the questionnaire and the scores on content-related questionnaires and scales were examined. Finally, scores from the clinical respondents and existing data from a previously collected non-clinical sample (n = 157) were compared to evaluate the external validity. The overall results demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, a consistent factor structure, and systematic patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Additionally, the findings indicated that the instrument clearly differentiated the clinical sample from the non-clinical sample.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WORLD PSYCHIATRY
[3]  
APA, 1980, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
[4]   THE 20-ITEM TORONTO-ALEXITHYMIA-SCALE .1. ITEM SELECTION AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF THE FACTOR STRUCTURE [J].
BAGBY, RM ;
PARKER, JDA ;
TAYLOR, GJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1994, 38 (01) :23-32
[5]  
Barrett LF, 2017, How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain
[6]  
Basch M.F., 1983, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, V3, P691, DOI DOI 10.1080/07351698309533522
[7]   Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions [J].
Berking, Matthias ;
Wupperman, Peggilee .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 25 (02) :128-134
[8]  
Bryman A., 2003, The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods
[9]   Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation [J].
Chapman, Alexander L. .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 31 (03) :1143-1156
[10]   Mentalization: Ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder [J].
Choi-Kain, Lois W. ;
Gunderson, John G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 165 (09) :1127-1135