Comparison of methods to identify long term care nursing home residence with administrative data

被引:53
作者
Goodwin, James S. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Li, Shuang [2 ]
Zhou, Jie [2 ]
Graham, James E. [2 ,3 ]
Karmarkar, Amol [2 ,3 ]
Ottenbacher, Kenneth [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Med, 301 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Univ Texas Med Branch, Sealy Ctr Aging, 301 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Rehabil Sci, 301 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, George & Cynthia Mitchell Distinguished Chair Ger, 301 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Nursing home; Long term care; Minimum Data Set; Medicare; MEDICARE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-017-2318-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To compare different methods for identifying a long term care (LTC) nursing home stay, distinct from stays in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), to the method currently used by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). We used national and Texas Medicare claims, Minimum Data Set (MDS), and Texas Medicaid data from 2011-2013. Methods: We used Medicare Part A and B and MDS data either alone or in combination to identify LTC nursing home stays by three methods. One method used Medicare Part A and B data; one method used Medicare Part A and MDS data; and the current CMS method used MDS data alone. We validated each method against Texas 2011 Medicare-Medicaid linked data for those with dual eligibility. Results: Using Medicaid data as a gold standard, all three methods had sensitivities > 92% to identify LTC nursing home stays of more than 100 days in duration. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the method that used both MDS and Medicare Part A data was 84.65% compared to 78.71% for the CMS method and 66.45% for the method using Part A and B Medicare. When the patient population was limited to those who also had a SNF stay, the PPV for identifying LTC nursing home was highest for the method using Medicare plus MDS data (88.1%). Conclusions: Using both Medicare and MDS data to identify LTC stays will lead to more accurate attribution of CMS nursing home quality indicators.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Brady EL, 2013, PAYMENT NURSING HOME
[2]   Setting Value-Based Payment Goals - HHS Efforts to Improve US Health Care [J].
Burwell, Sylvia M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (10) :897-899
[3]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 2015, MDS 3 0 QUAL MEAS US
[4]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 2015, MIN DAT SET VER 3 0
[5]   Risk of Continued Institutionalization After Hospitalization in Older Adults [J].
Goodwin, James S. ;
Howrey, Bret ;
Zhang, Dong D. ;
Kuo, Yong-Fang .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 66 (12) :1321-1327
[6]   The Residential History File: Studying Nursing Home Residents' Long-Term Care Histories [J].
Intrator, Orna ;
Hiris, Jeffrey ;
Berg, Katherine ;
Miller, Susan C. ;
Mor, Vince .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :120-137
[7]  
Iwashyna T.J., 2003, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, V4, P187
[8]   Ability of Medicare Claims Data to Identify Nursing Home Patients A Validation Study [J].
Koroukian, Siran M. ;
Xu, Fang ;
Murray, Patrick .
MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (11) :1184-1187
[9]  
MaCurdy T, 2015, REPORT COMMISSIONED
[10]   Geographic Variation in Medicare Services [J].
Newhouse, Joseph P. ;
Garber, Alan M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (16) :1465-1468