A prospective population-based study of cutaneous malignant melanoma of the head and neck

被引:38
作者
Gillgren, P [1 ]
Månsson-Brahme, E
Frisell, J
Johansson, H
Larsson, O
Ringborg, U
机构
[1] Stocholm Soder Hosp, Dept Surg, SE-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Huddinge Univ Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Hosp, Radiumhemmet, Dept Oncol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Pathol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
melanoma; head and neck neoplasms; epidemiology; treatment outcome; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1097/00005537-200009000-00017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis: For cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) of the head and neck, neither prognostic factors in population-based groups, nor outcome with respect to surgical resection margins is clear. Therefore, we analyzed data in a regional registry to align treatment results for CMM of the head and neck with prognosis and survival times. Study Design: Patient material collected prospectively for an 18-year period in a Swedish cancer registry underwent statistical analyses to establish the most reliable prognostic factors and the influence of surgical treatment on the survival of patients with CMM of the head and neck. Methods: Data originated from the CMM database of the Stockholm-Gotland area of Sweden. Tumor thickness or invasiveness (Breslow or Clark's levels), extent of surgical margin, sex, histogenetic type, anatomic site, and ulceration were compared statistically for 469 patients. Results: Male patients with head and neck CMM had a 68% 10-year survival rate; the 10-year survival rate for female patients was 87%. The corresponding figures for CMM at other sites were 83% and 90%, respectively. Tumor thickness (or Clark level of invasion) was the only statistically significant prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis (P < .001). The surgical resection margin seemed to be of no importance to outcome. Conclusions: Long-term survival after treatment for CMM of the head and neck is better than reported in most earlier publications, presumably because our evaluation used population-based materials, an important factor in accurate reporting of this kind. Tumor thickness is the main prognostic factor in estimating outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1498 / 1504
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL AND DISEASE CONTROL IN STAGE 1 MELANOMA OF HEAD AND NECK
    AMES, FC
    SUGARBAKER, EV
    BALLANTYNE, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 132 (04) : 484 - 491
  • [2] Prognosis of thin cutaneous head and neck melanoma (<1 mm)
    Andersson, AP
    Dahlstrom, KK
    Drzewiecki, KT
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 22 (01): : 55 - 57
  • [3] ANDERSSON AP, 1992, CANCER, V69, P1153
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1977, International Classification of Diseases
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND SURGICAL RESULTS IN 1,786 PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED (STAGE-1) MELANOMA TREATED IN ALABAMA, USA, AND NEW-SOUTH-WALES, AUSTRALIA
    BALCH, CM
    SOONG, SJ
    MILTON, GW
    SHAW, HM
    MCGOVERN, VJ
    MURAD, TM
    MCCARTHY, WH
    MADDOX, WA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1982, 196 (06) : 677 - 684
  • [6] BALCH CM, 1992, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA, P165
  • [7] AMLIGNANT MELANOMA OF SKIN OF HEAD AND NECK - AN ANALYSIS OF 405 CASES
    BALLANTY.AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1970, 120 (04) : 425 - &
  • [9] BUZAID AC, 1998, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA, P37
  • [10] CLARK WH, 1969, CANCER RES, V29, P705