Engaging Stakeholders in Identifying Access Research Priorities for the Department of Veterans Affairs

被引:5
作者
McNeal, Demetria M. [1 ]
Fehling, Kelty [2 ]
Ho, P. Michael [2 ]
Kaboli, Peter [3 ]
Shimada, Stephanie [4 ]
Saini, Sameer D. [5 ]
Youles, Bradley [5 ]
Albright, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Acad Off One, Div Gen Internal Med, Sch Med, 12631 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Ctr, Denver Seattle Ctr Innovat Vet Ctr & Value Driven, 1700 N Wheeling St, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Iowa VA Healthcare Syst, Iowa City VA Ctr Access Delivery Res, 601 Highway 6 West, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] VA Bedford Healthcare Syst, VA Ctr Healthcare Org & Implementat Res, 200 Springs Rd,Bldg 70, Bedford, MA USA
[5] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, VA Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, 2215 Fuller Rd,Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11606-021-07195-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Access Research Consortium (VARC), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Consortium of Research focused on access to healthcare, has been funded by VA's Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D) to develop a research roadmap for healthcare access. The goal of the roadmap is to identify operationally aligned research questions that are most likely to lead to meaningful improvements in Veterans' healthcare access. OBJECTIVES: To describe the process of soliciting diverse stakeholder perspectives about key priorities on which VA's HSR&D access agenda should focus and identify the results of that process. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi approach to engage researchers and VA operational partners in a process to develop recommendations regarding the access-related research questions VA should prioritize. We then collaborated with three Veteran Engagement Groups (VEGs) across the country to solicit Veterans' reactions to the Delphi results and their perspectives about accessrelated issues affecting access to VA health care. RESULTS: The Delphi panel consisted of 22 resParch and operational experts, both internal and external to VA. The Delphi process resulted in five research questions identified by the panelists as highest priority for VA to pursue, each representing one of the following domains: (1) measurement of access, (2) barriers to access, (3) equity and subpopulations, (4) effective interventions to improve access, and (5) consequences of poor/better access. Veterans' perspectives focused primarily on the barriers to access domain. Veterans indicated several barriers that might be addressed through research or operational initiatives, including poor communication about services, weak connections to and partnerships with local community care facilities, and poor provision of telehealth resources and education. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging multiple methods to solicit stakeholder perspectives enables more nuanced understanding of access-related priorities for VA. Future research should consider utilizing such an approach to identify additional research and/or operational priorities. (C) The Author(s) 2021. This article is an open access publication
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Financial and Temporal Advantages of Virtual Consultation in Veterans Requiring Specialty Care [J].
Abbott, Daniel E. ;
Macke, Ryan A. ;
Kurtz, Jodi ;
Safdar, Nasia ;
Greenberg, Caprice C. ;
Weber, Sharon M. ;
Voils, Corrine I. ;
Fisher, Deborah A. ;
Maloney, James D. .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 2018, 183 (1-2) :E71-E76
[2]   The VA MISSION Act and Community Care for Veterans: What Every Community GI Doc Needs to Know [J].
Adams, Megan A. ;
Sayre, George G. ;
Saini, Sameer D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 (08) :1189-1191
[3]  
Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE, DOI 10.7748/nr.13.4.84.s4
[4]   Veteran-centered barriers to VA mental healthcare services use [J].
Cheney, Ann M. ;
Koenig, Christopher J. ;
Miller, Christopher J. ;
Zamora, Kara ;
Wright, Patricia ;
Stanley, Regina ;
Fortney, John ;
Burgess, James F. ;
Pyne, Jeffrey M. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
[5]   Disparities in digital access among American rural and urban households and implications for telemedicine-based services [J].
Curtis, Megan E. ;
Clingan, Sarah E. ;
Guo, Huiying ;
Zhu, Yuhui ;
Mooney, Larissa J. ;
Hser, Yih-Ing .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2022, 38 (03) :512-518
[6]   The Delphi technique in health sciences education research [J].
De Villiers, MR ;
De Villiers, PJT ;
Kent, AP .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2005, 27 (07) :639-643
[7]  
Desko Lauren, 2014, J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother, V28, P359, DOI 10.3109/15360288.2014.969875
[8]  
Dietert Michelle, 2017, Transgend Health, V2, P35, DOI 10.1089/trgh.2016.0040
[9]   A Re-conceptualization of Access for 21st Century Healthcare [J].
Fortney, John C. ;
Burgess, James F., Jr. ;
Bosworth, Hayden B. ;
Booth, Brenda M. ;
Kaboli, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 :S639-S647
[10]   Veteran Coffee Socials: A Community-Building Strategy for Enhancing Community Reintegration of Veterans [J].
Gorman, Jay A. ;
Scoglio, Arielle A. J. ;
Smolinsky, John ;
Russo, Antony ;
Drebing, Charles E. .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2018, 54 (08) :1189-1197