Psychological bases of support for radical right parties

被引:54
作者
Aichholzer, Julian [1 ]
Zandonella, Martina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Methods Social Sci, Rathausstr 19, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] SORA Inst Social Res & Consulting, Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Voting behavior; Radical right parties; Personality; Authoritarianism; Social dominance orientation; Social threat; 5; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; WESTERN-EUROPE; AUTHORITARIANISM; IDEOLOGY; PREFERENCE; ATTITUDES; POLITICS; THREAT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.072
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We examine the social-psychological and personality bases of support for radical right parties (RRPs), using cognitive-motivational approaches of ideology. Our comprehensive model includes core ideological variables which mediate personality traits (Big Five) or how individuals engage in social relationships and accommodate novel stimuli. Structural equation models were tested in an Austrian population sample to examine support for a RRP, the FPO. Our results suggest that a "perceived immigrant threat" and, in part, social dominance orientation are directly related to RAP support, whereas right-wing authoritarianism has consistent indirect (mediated) impact Associations with lower Openness to Experience, lower Agreeableness, and to some extent also with Conscientiousness are mediated by the ideological variables. The conclusion discusses how RRPs' success and communication strategies can be linked to basic psychological motivations. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 190
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? [J].
DeYoung, CG ;
Peterson, JB ;
Higgins, DM .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2002, 33 (04) :533-552
[12]   AUTHORITARIANISM AND GROUP IDENTIFICATION - A NEW VIEW OF AN OLD CONSTRUCT [J].
DUCKITT, J .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 10 (01) :63-84
[13]   A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice [J].
Duckitt, John ;
Sibley, Chris G. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2009, 20 (2-3) :98-109
[14]   Preference for radical right-wing populist parties among exclusive-nationalists and authoritarians [J].
Dunn, Kris .
PARTY POLITICS, 2015, 21 (03) :367-380
[15]   The homogeneity of West European party families: The radical right in comparative perspective [J].
Ennser, Laurenz .
PARTY POLITICS, 2012, 18 (02) :151-171
[16]   The Big Five Personality Traits and Attitudes towards Immigrants [J].
Gallego, Aina ;
Pardos-Prado, Sergi .
JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 2014, 40 (01) :79-99
[17]   The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena [J].
Gerber, Alan S. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Doherty, David ;
Dowling, Conor M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 14, 2011, 14 :265-287
[18]   Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology [J].
Hibbing, John R. ;
Smith, Kevin B. ;
Alford, John R. .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2014, 37 (03) :297-+
[19]   What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases [J].
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2008, 41 (01) :3-23
[20]   Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities [J].
Jost, John T. ;
Federico, Christopher M. ;
Napier, Jaime L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :307-337