Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation

被引:35
作者
Pitanguy, Ivo
Vaena, Michel
Radwanski, Henrique N.
Nunes, Daniel
Vargas, Andre F.
机构
[1] Carlos Chagas Inst Postgrad Med Studies, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Ivo Pitanguy Inst, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio de Janeiro, Dept Plast Surg, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
breast augmentation; implant; relative volume; sensibility alterations;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-006-0173-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent studies have provided diverging results regarding the factors that may affect sensibility after primary breast augmentation. Implant volume is believed to be an important factor, but the relation of implant size to breast volume has not been adequately addressed. In addition, the literature shows that a conflict exists when the periareolar and inframammary approaches are compared. This study aimed to refine the volumetric analysis comparing the implant and final breast size as well as the intrinsic association of these two factors with postoperative sensory alteration of the breast. Methods: A prospective study investigated patients who underwent aesthetic breast augmentation between June 2004 and October 2005 (i.e., a 16-month period) at the Ivo Pitanguy Institute. The sensibility in nine regions of the breast was tested before and after surgery using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Breast sizers were used to compare the pre- and postoperative breast volumes. Statistical analysis of the data took into consideration the relative volume of the implant, the surgical approach, the presence of minor complications, the breast-feeding history, and the subjective evaluation of sensory changes in the patients. Results: A total of 37 patients who underwent breast augmentation were examined preoperatively. The relative volume of the implant was found to be associated with sensibility alterations. No difference was found between the periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Other factors such as previous breast-feeding, minor complications, and subjective alterations were not associated with sensory alterations. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that larger implants and smaller breasts show an increased association with postoperative sensory alterations of the breast. Plastic surgeons and their patients should be aware of this possibility. Implant volume should be considered together with breast size to avoid sensory complications, and this is summarized in the concept of relative volume.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 243
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: Sensory changes, muscle function, and body image
    Banbury, J
    Yetman, R
    Lucas, A
    Papay, F
    Graves, K
    Zins, JE
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (02) : 701 - 707
  • [2] Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis
    Benediktsson, KP
    Perbeck, L
    Geigant, E
    Solders, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (06): : 443 - 449
  • [3] COURTISS EH, 1976, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V58, P1
  • [4] INNERVATION OF THE NIPPLE-AREOLA COMPLEX
    FARINA, MA
    NEWBY, BG
    ALANI, HM
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1980, 66 (04) : 497 - 501
  • [5] AUGMENTATION MAMMAPALSTY - RESULTS OF A PATIENT SURVEY
    FIALA, TGS
    LEE, WPA
    MAY, JW
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1993, 30 (06) : 503 - 509
  • [6] FRANCA AL, 2005, REV SOC BRAS CIR PLA, V20, P204
  • [7] PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE NIPPLE-AREOLA SENSIBILITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY
    GONZALEZ, F
    BROWN, FE
    GOLD, ME
    WALTON, RL
    SHAFER, B
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 92 (05) : 809 - 814
  • [8] SATISFACTIONS AND DISSATISFACTIONS OF PATIENTS WITH AUGMENTATION MAMMAPLASTY
    HETTER, GP
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1979, 64 (02) : 151 - 155
  • [9] The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: Implications for surgery
    Jaspars, JJP
    Posma, AN
    vanImmerseel, AAH
    GittenbergerdeGroot, AC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (04): : 249 - 259
  • [10] Nipple areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: A comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches
    Mofid, MM
    Klatsky, SA
    Singh, NK
    Nahabedian, MY
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (06) : 1694 - 1698