A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists

被引:360
作者
Moon, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Blackman, Deborah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Univ Canberra, ANZSOG Inst Governance, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Business, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
epistemology; interdisciplinary research; ontology; research design; theoretical perspective; worldview; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; PARADIGMS; WILDLIFE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12326
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Natural scientists are increasingly interested in social research because they recognize that conservation problems are commonly social problems. Interpreting social research, however, requires at least a basic understanding of the philosophical principles and theoretical assumptions of the discipline, which are embedded in the design of social research. Natural scientists who engage in social science but are unfamiliar with these principles and assumptions can misinterpret their results. We developed a guide to assist natural scientists in understanding the philosophical basis of social science to support the meaningful interpretation of social research outcomes. The 3 fundamental elements of research are ontology, what exists in the human world that researchers can acquire knowledge about; epistemology, how knowledge is created; and philosophical perspective, the philosophical orientation of the researcher that guides her or his action. Many elements of the guide also apply to the natural sciences. Natural scientists can use the guide to assist them in interpreting social science research to determine how the ontological position of the researcher can influence the nature of the research; how the epistemological position can be used to support the legitimacy of different types of knowledge; and how philosophical perspective can shape the researcher's choice of methods and affect interpretation, communication, and application of results. The use of this guide can also support and promote the effective integration of the natural and social sciences to generate more insightful and relevant conservation research outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1167 / 1177
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Conserving manatees: Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions of boaters in Tampa Bay, Florida [J].
Aipanjiguly, S ;
Jacobson, SK ;
Flamm, R .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :1098-1105
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CONDUCTING RES CONSE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PARADIGM DIALOG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, SOCIAL THEORY TODAY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Handbook of qualitative research
[7]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS PRACTICE INTR
[8]   Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology [J].
Balmford, Andrew ;
Cowling, Richard M. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :692-695
[9]   Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour [J].
Beedell, J ;
Rehman, T .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2000, 16 (01) :117-127
[10]  
Biesta G., 2010, SAGE HDB MIXED METHO, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781506335193.N4