机构:
Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, SpainUniv Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
Bona-Sanchez, Carolina
[1
]
Perez-Aleman, Jeronimo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, SpainUniv Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
Perez-Aleman, Jeronimo
[1
]
Santana Martin, Domingo Javier
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, SpainUniv Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
Santana Martin, Domingo Javier
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Financial Econ & Accounting, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
来源:
SPANISH JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING-REVISTA ESPANOLA DE FINANCIACION Y CONTABILIDA
|
2020年
/
49卷
/
01期
关键词:
Corporate tax burden;
board of directors;
politically connected boards;
family control;
FAMILY OWNERSHIP;
ULTIMATE OWNERSHIP;
FIRM PERFORMANCE;
CONNECTED FIRMS;
PANEL-DATA;
SHAREHOLDERS;
EARNINGS;
AGGRESSIVENESS;
INFORMATIVENESS;
SEPARATION;
D O I:
10.1080/02102412.2019.1573049
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
This work examines the relationship between political ties and tax burden in a sample of non-financial Spanish-listed firms during the period 2003-2013. Moreover, we analyse whether such incidence is dependent upon family control. In a context where political ties exist for business strategy reasons rather than for public policy ones, our results reveal that politically connected boards reduce tax burden. Thus, for politically connected firms, the benefits of tax avoidance strategies outweigh their associated costs and risks. Furthermore, our results also show that politically connected family firms increase tax burden. These results are consistent with family firms' distinctive features, increasing the costs and risks derived from strategies aimed at decreasing the tax burden in the presence of political ties. Alternatively, this latter result might also be explained by a greater need to legitimise corporate behaviour using tax policy for politically connected family firms.