When is model complexity too much? Illustrating the benefits of simple models with Hughes' salvo equations

被引:26
作者
Lucas, TW
McGunnigle, JE
机构
[1] USN, Postgrad Sch, Dept Operat Res, Monterey, CA 93943 USA
[2] USN, Kings Bay, GA 31547 USA
关键词
combat models; defense analysis; Hughes' salvo equations; JWARS; simulation; value of information;
D O I
10.1002/nav.10062
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The simulations that many defense analysts rely upon in their studies continue to grow in size and complexity. This paper contrasts the guidance that the authors have received-from some of the giants of military operations research-with the current practice. In particular, the analytic utility of Hughes' simple salvo equations is compared with that of the complex Joint Warfighting System (JWARS), with respect to JWARS' key performance parameters. The comparison suggests that a family of analytic tools supports the best analyses. It follows that smaller, more agile, and transparent models, such as Hughes' salvo equations, are underutilized in defense analyses. We believe that these models should receive more attention, use, and funding. To illustrate this point, this paper uses two very simple models (by modem standards) to rapidly generate insights on the value of information relative to force strength. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 217
页数:21
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, WARFARE MODELING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Formal representation of human judgment
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, ROBUSTNESS STAT
[4]  
BENNETT B, 1999, UNPUB MODELING SIMUL
[5]  
BETTENCOURT V, 1997, INTRO 3 EDITION MILI, pR7
[6]   Army operations research - Historical perspectives and lessons learned [J].
Bonder, S .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 50 (01) :25-34
[7]  
BRANDSTEIN A, 1999, PHALANX, V32, P30
[8]  
BUILDER C, 1989, IN25659A RAND
[9]  
CEBROWSKI A, 1999, US NAV I P, V125, P31
[10]  
DAVIS PK, 1999, DB278OSD RAND