Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type

被引:718
作者
Banerjee, SB [1 ]
Iyer, ES
Kashyap, RK
机构
[1] Univ S Australia, Int Grad Sch Management, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Isenberg Sch Management, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] William Paterson Univ, Coll Business, Dept Management & Mkt, Wayne, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How does a business firm manage its relationship with the natural environment? What are the factors that influence the choice of such strategies? Does industry type matter? The authors introduce and operationalize the concept of corporate environmentalism in an effort to answer these questions. Using stakeholder theory, the authors identify four important antecedents to corporate environmentalism, namely, public concern, regulatory forces, competitive advantage, and top management commitment. The authors then use a political-economic framework to develop testable hypotheses. To test the hypotheses, the authors perform multigroup path analysis on data gathered from more than 240 firms. They find that corporate environmentalism is related to all hypothesized antecedents and that industry type moderates several of those relationships. In the high environmental impact sector, public concern has the greatest impact on corporate environmentalism, followed by regulatory forces. In the moderate environmental impact sector, competitive advantage has the greatest impact on corporate environmentalism, followed by regulatory forces. There are strong direct and mediating influences from top management commitment, which is the antecedent with the greatest impact on both industry groups. The influences of regulatory forces, public concern, and competitive advantage are all significantly mediated by top management commitment and moderated by industry type. The empirical findings and the ensuing discussion will be of interest to managers and public policy officials.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 122
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]  
Freeman RE., 2010, STRATEG MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139192675
[22]  
Ganesan S., 1994, J MARKETING, V58, P1, DOI DOI 10.2307/1252265
[23]   SHIFTING PARADIGMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH [J].
GLADWIN, TN ;
KENNELLY, JJ ;
KRAUSE, TS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (04) :874-907
[24]  
Hair J.F., 2010, Multivariate data analysis, V7th
[25]   Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives [J].
Harrison, JS ;
Freeman, RE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :479-485
[26]  
Hart SL, 1997, HARVARD BUS REV, V75, P66
[27]   Corridors of influence in the dissemination of customer-oriented strategy to customer contact service employees [J].
Hartline, MD ;
Maxham, JG ;
McKee, DO .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2000, 64 (02) :35-50
[28]   The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance [J].
Henriques, I ;
Sadorsky, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (01) :87-99
[29]   Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry [J].
Hoffman, AJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (04) :351-371
[30]  
IYER ES, 1999, GREENER MARKETING GL, P181