Clinical and radiographic outcomes following transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation with injectable xenogenous bone substitute in gel form: a prospective multicenter study

被引:5
作者
Lombardi, Teresa [1 ]
Lamazza, Luca [2 ]
Bernardello, Fabio [3 ]
Zietek, Grzegorz [4 ]
Stacchi, Claudio [5 ]
Troiano, Giuseppe [6 ]
机构
[1] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Dept Hlth Sci, I-88100 Catanzaro, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Sci, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Studio Bernardello, Via Bonvicini 42, I-37045 Verona, Italy
[4] Zietek Clin, PL-31315 Krakow, Poland
[5] Univ Trieste, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, I-34100 Trieste, Italy
[6] Univ Foggia, Dept Clin & Expt Med, I-71122 Foggia, Italy
关键词
Maxillary sinus augmentation; Transcrestal approach; Gel graft; IMPLANT-SUPPORTED REHABILITATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE MANAGEMENT; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; HYDRAULIC PRESSURE; SEQUENTIAL DRILLS; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANE; DEVICE; WIDTH; LIFT;
D O I
10.1186/s40729-022-00431-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes of transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation performed with an injectable xenograft in gel form, analyzing general, local and surgical variables possibly influencing the results. Methods: Patients with residual crestal height < 5 mm underwent transcrestal sinus floor elevation with xenograft in gel form to allow the placement of a single implant. Simultaneous implant placement was performed when primary stability was >= 15 Ncm. Graft height was measured immediately after surgery (T0) and after 6 months of healing (T1). Univariate and multivariate regression models were built to assess associations between clinical variables with implant survival and graft height at T1. Results: 71 patients underwent transcrestal sinus floor elevation and 54 implants were simultaneously placed. Delayed implant placement (at T1) was possible in 5 cases out of 17 (29.4%), whereas in 12 patients (70.6%) implant insertion was not possible or required additional sinus grafting. Implant survival rate, with a follow-up varying from 12 to 32 months after loading, was 100%. Mean pre-operative bone height was 3.8 +/- 1.0 mm, at T0 was 13.9 +/- 2.2 mm and at T1 was 9.9 +/- 2.8 mm. Bone height at T1 was negatively influenced by membrane perforation at surgery (p = 0.004) and positively influenced by immediate implant insertion (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Transcrestal sinus floor elevation performed with injectable xenograft gel resulted in 100% implant survival rate. However, immediate implant insertion seems a crucial factor to preserve vertical bone gain: one-stage technique seems to be the most predictable approach to optimize clinical outcomes with this approach.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis of the increase in height in maxillary sinus elevations with osteotome
    Antonaya-Mira, Rocio
    Barona-Dorado, Cristina
    Martinez-Rodriguez, Natalia
    Caceres-Madrono, Esther
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Jose-Ma
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2012, 17 (01): : E146 - E152
  • [2] Maxillary sinus augmentation model in rabbits: effect of occluded nasal ostium on new bone formation
    Asai, S
    Shimizu, Y
    Ooya, K
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (04) : 405 - 409
  • [3] Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of sinus floor elevation using the lateral window technique versus the hydrodynamic transalveolar approach: a preliminary randomized controlled trial
    Bacevic, Miljana
    Compeyron, Yoann
    Lecloux, Geoffrey
    Rompen, Eric
    Lambert, France
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (09) : 5391 - 5401
  • [4] Bernardello F., 2021, Sinusitis, V5, P132, DOI [10.3390/sinusitis5020014, DOI 10.3390/SINUSITIS5020014]
  • [5] Stage Characterization and Marginal Bone Loss Evaluation Up to 96 Months of Crestal Sinus Augmentation With Sequential Drills: A Retrospective Study
    Bernardello, Fabio
    Felice, Pietro
    Spinato, Sergio
    Rebaudi, Alberto
    Righi, Davide
    Malagoli, Claudio
    Torres-Lagares, Daniel
    Flores Ruiz, Rafael
    Zaffe, Davide
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (06) : 642 - 649
  • [6] Crestal Sinus Lift With Sequential Drills and Simultaneous Implant Placement in Sites With &lt;5 mm of Native Bone: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Bernardello, Fabio
    Righi, Davide
    Cosci, Ferdinando
    Bozzoli, Paolo
    Carlo, Maria Soardi
    Spinato, Sergio
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2011, 20 (06) : 439 - 444
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Sinus Lift Implant Device: A Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Trial Preliminary Results
    Better, Hadar
    Slavescu, Dragos
    Barbu, Horia
    Cochran, David L.
    Chaushu, Gabi
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) : 520 - 526
  • [8] Combination of a Hydraulic Device and Nanohydroxylapatite Paste for Minimally Invasive Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: Procedure and 4-Year Results
    Blase, Didier Victor
    Dricot, Roland Georges
    Lasserre, Jerome Frederic
    Toma, Selena
    Brecx, Michel Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (03) : 587 - 597
  • [9] BOYNE PJ, 1980, J ORAL SURG, V38, P613
  • [10] Crestal Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Hydraulic Pressure and Vibrations: A Retrospective Single Cohort Study
    Bruckmoser, Emanuel
    Gruber, Reinhard
    Steinmassl, Otto
    Eder, Klaus
    Watzinger, Franz
    Bayerle-Eder, Michaela
    Jesch, Philip
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (05) : 1149 - 1154