Aspen development on similar soils in Minnesota and British Columbia after compaction and forest floor removal

被引:22
作者
Stone, DM
Kabzems, R
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, N Cent Res Stn, Grand Rapids, MN 55744 USA
[2] British Columbia Minist Forests, Prince George Reg, Ft St John, BC V1J 6M2, Canada
关键词
sustainable management; organic matter removal; soil compaction; aspen sucker density; height growth;
D O I
10.5558/tfc78886-6
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest management practices that decrease soil porosity and remove organic matter can reduce site productivity. We evaluated effects of four treatments-merchantable bole harvest (MBH) with three levels of soil compaction (none, light, or heady), and total woody vegetation harvest plus forest floor removal (FFR)-on fifth-year regeneration and growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) growing on soils with similar textures (20-40 cm silt loam over clay loam till) in northern Minnesota (MN) and northeastern British Columbia (BC). Overall mean sucker density was significantly greater in BC than in MN, and mean height was significantly lower. Soil compaction did not affect sucker density in BC. but significantly reduced it in MN, primarily due to late spring treatment. In BC, mean sucker heights generally decreased with level of compaction, but only the differences between non-compacted and the heavy compaction treatments were significant. On the MN plots, sucker heights were reduced significantly by compaction, Treatment responses were similar on both sites: (1) the greatest sucker densities were in the FFR treatment (2) greatest mean heights were on the non-compacted]MBH plots and were significantly greater than those in the FFR treatment (3) sucker heights generally decreased with level of compaction; and (4) soil compaction decreased the number of suckers that had reached a dbh of 25 mm after five years and will likely delay future stand development and reduce site productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:886 / 891
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AGREN GI, 1986, P IEA BE PROJ CPC 10
[2]  
ALBAN DH, 1994, NC315 USDA FOR SERV
[3]  
*AN SOFTW, 2000, STAT WIND US MAN
[4]  
BATES PC, 1990, US FOR SERV T R NC, V140, P221
[5]   HARVESTING IMPACTS ON QUAKING ASPEN REGENERATION IN NORTHERN MINNESOTA [J].
BATES, PC ;
BLINN, CR ;
ALM, AA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1993, 23 (11) :2403-2412
[6]   COMPACTION OF FOREST SOILS - A REVIEW [J].
GREACEN, EL ;
SANDS, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1980, 18 (02) :163-189
[7]  
GRIER CC, 1989, PNW222 USDA FOR SERV
[8]  
HARPER KT, 1985, ASPEN ECOLOGY MANAGE, P7
[9]  
Jones J. R., 1985, ASPEN ECOLOGY MANAGE, P35
[10]  
KABZEMS R, 1996, PG06 BRIT COL MIN FO