Water equivalence of various materials for clinical proton dosimetry by experiment and Monte Carlo simulation

被引:18
作者
Al-Sulaiti, Leena [1 ,2 ]
Shipley, David [2 ]
Thomas, Russell [2 ]
Kacperek, Andrzej [3 ]
Regan, Patrick [1 ]
Palmans, Hugo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[2] Natl Phys Lab, Acoust & Ionising Radiat Team, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
[3] Clatterbridge Ctr Oncol, Wirral, Merseyside, England
关键词
Proton dosimetry; Fluence correction factor; Dosimetry; Dose conversion; Water equivalence; Monte Carlo; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2010.01.026
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
The accurate conversion of dose to various materials used in clinical proton dosimetry to dose-to-water is based on fluence correction factors, accounting for attenuation of primary protons and production of secondary particles due to non-elastic nuclear interactions. This work aims to investigate the depth dose distribution and the fluence correction with respect to water or graphite at water equivalent depths (WED) in different target materials relevant for dosimetry such as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), graphite, A-150, aluminium and copper at 60 and 200 MeV. This was done through a comparison between Monte Carlo simulation using MCNPX 2.5.0, analytical model calculations and experimental measurements at Clatterbridge Centre of Oncology (CCO) in a 60 MeV modulated and un-modulated proton beam. MCNPX simulations indicated small fluence corrections for all materials with respect to graphite and water in 60 and 200 MeV except for aluminium. The analytical calculations showed an increase in the fluence correction factor to a few percent for all materials with respect to water at 200 MeV. The experimental measurements for 60 MeV un-modulated beam indicated a good agreement with MCNPX. For the modulated beam the fluence correction factor was found to be decreasing below unity by up to few percent with depth for aluminium and copper but almost constant and unity for A-150. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 347
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ICRU63
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MCNPX user's manual version 2.5.0
[3]   Proton dosimetry comparison involving ionometry and calorimetry [J].
Delacroix, S ;
Bridier, A ;
Mazal, A ;
Daures, J ;
Ostrowsky, A ;
Nauraye, C ;
Kacperek, A ;
Vynkier, S ;
Brassard, N ;
Habrand, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03) :711-718
[4]  
ICRU, 1993, 49 ICRU
[5]  
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2000, Technical Reports Series, V398
[6]   Protontherapy of eye tumours in the UK: A review of treatment at Clatterbridge [J].
Kacperek, A. .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2009, 67 (03) :378-386
[7]   Calibration of a proton beam energy monitor [J].
Moyers, M. F. ;
Coutrakon, G. B. ;
Ghebremedhin, A. ;
Shahnazi, K. ;
Koss, P. ;
Sanders, E. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) :1952-1966
[8]   Dose to water versus dose to medium in proton beam therapy [J].
Paganetti, Harald .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (14) :4399-4421
[9]   A small-body portable graphite calorimeter for dosimetry in low-energy clinical proton beams [J].
Palmans, H ;
Thomas, R ;
Simon, M ;
Duane, S ;
Kacperek, A ;
DuSautoy, A ;
Verhaegen, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (16) :3737-3749
[10]   Calculated depth dose distributions for proton beams in some low-Z materials [J].
Palmans, H ;
Verhaegen, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (06) :1175-1183