共 62 条
Combined membrane and thermal desalination processes for the treatment of ion exchange resins spent brine
被引:26
作者:
Micari, M.
[1
]
Cipollina, A.
[2
]
Tamburini, A.
[2
]
Moser, M.
[1
]
Bertsch, V
[1
,3
]
Micale, G.
[2
]
机构:
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Engn Thermodynam, Pfaffenwaldring 38-40, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Palermo UNIPA, DI, Viale Sci 6, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[3] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Bldg Energet Thermotechnol & Energy Storage, Pfaffenwaldring 6, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
来源:
关键词:
Industrial wastewater;
Nanofiltration;
Wastewater treatment;
Techno-economic analysis;
Circular economy;
Waste heat recovery;
WASTE-WATER TREATMENT;
NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;
ENERGY NEXUS;
SEAWATER DESALINATION;
DIELECTRIC-PROPERTIES;
PERFORMANCE;
OPTIMIZATION;
EFFICIENCY;
HARDNESS;
PRETREATMENT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113699
中图分类号:
TE [石油、天然气工业];
TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号:
0807 ;
0820 ;
摘要:
The disposal of industrial wastewater effluents represents a critical environmental issue. This work focuses on the treatment of the spent brine produced by the regeneration of ion exchange resins employed for water softening. For the first time, a comprehensive techno-economic assessment and an analysis of the energy requirements of the treatment chain are carried out, via the simulation of ad hoc implemented models. The chain is composed of nanofiltration, double-stage crystallization and multi-effect distillation. The valuable product is the brine produced by the multi-effect distillation, which can be re-used for the regeneration. Therefore, the treatment chain's economic feasibility is evaluated via the Levelized Brine Cost, which includes the terms of cost and revenue of every unit in the chain. Varying the nanofiltration recovery, the treatment system always turns out to be economically competitive, since the Levelized Brine Cost is lower than the current cost of the fresh regenerant solution (8 $/m(3)). In particular, the lowest value of 4.9 $/m(3) is found for a nanofiltration recovery of 25%. Moreover, the cost of the reactant used in the crystallization and the revenues of Mg(OH)(2) and Ca(OH)(2) play a prominent role in all scenarios. Regarding the energy demand, the thermal energy required by the evaporator is the main contribution and covers more than 30% of the operating costs (excluding the cost of the crystallization reactant, which is balanced by the hydroxides revenues). Therefore, the costs can be significantly reduced when waste heat is available in the industrial site. Overall, the treatment chain is economically feasible and allows reducing the industrial environmental impact by recycling waste streams and waste heat.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文