Plant species delimitation: A comparison of morphological and molecular markers

被引:139
作者
Duminil, J. [1 ,2 ]
Di Michele, M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Serv Evolut Biol & Ecol, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Fac Univ Sci Agron Gembloux, Ecol Lab, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ, John Paul II Ctr High Technol Res & Educ Biomed S, Lab Analyt Tech & Prote, I-8610 Campobasso, Italy
[4] Univ Louvain, Ctr Mol & Vasc Biol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
来源
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS | 2009年 / 143卷 / 03期
关键词
Cluster analysis; phylogenetic relationships; proteomics; species concept; systematics; GENETIC-VARIATION; CAREX-FLAVA; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; ISOZYME VARIATION; DUBAUTIA-ARBOREA; D-CILIOLATA; COMPLEX; CONSERVATION; DIFFERENTIATION; ASTERACEAE;
D O I
10.1080/11263500902722964
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Species delimitation is fundamental in many areas of biology. Despite its importance, there is no agreement on criteria for species delimitation mostly due to divergence on the point of view adopted by the different biological disciplines. Two main groups of diagnostic characters are commonly used to distinguish species: the traditional morphological ones and the molecular ones. Field species recognition and sampling are generally based on morphological characters, but they can either fail to discriminate species and mask the presence of cryptic species or discriminate different species while in reality there is only one. To overcome this problem it is common to compare clusters obtained on the basis of the observed polymorphism of both characters, and to analyse their agreement. Here we compile a set of studies that have examined species delimitation with both markers. This provides a review of the different morphological and molecular markers, and of the sampling strategy and clustering methodology generally employed to delimitate species. Some conclusions are drawn with regard to species delimitation, when comparing diagnostic morphological and molecular markers.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 542
页数:15
相关论文
共 84 条
[71]   Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences [J].
Soltis, DE ;
Soltis, PS ;
Chase, MW ;
Mort, ME ;
Albach, DC ;
Zanis, M ;
Savolainen, V ;
Hahn, WH ;
Hoot, SB ;
Fay, MF ;
Axtell, M ;
Swensen, SM ;
Prince, LM ;
Kress, WJ ;
Nixon, KC ;
Farris, JS .
BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2000, 133 (04) :381-461
[72]   Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: have we grossly underestimated the number of species? [J].
Soltis, Douglas E. ;
Soltis, Pamela S. ;
Schemske, Douglas W. ;
Hancock, James F. ;
Thompson, John N. ;
Husband, Brian C. ;
Judd, Walter S. .
TAXON, 2007, 56 (01) :13-30
[73]   Relationships between two infraspecific taxa of Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae).: II.: Isozyme evidence [J].
Speer, WD ;
Werth, CR ;
Hilu, KW .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1998, 23 (03) :313-325
[74]  
Thiellement H, 1999, ELECTROPHORESIS, V20, P2013, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19990701)20:10<2013::AID-ELPS2013>3.0.CO
[75]  
2-#
[76]   Nuclear cyp73 intron fragment length polymorphism supports morphological analysis of Salix species and hybrids [J].
Triest, L. ;
Trung, L. Q. ;
Talukder, A. K. M. Mominul Haque ;
Van Puyvelde, K. .
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 2009, 143 (03) :555-563
[77]  
Tsitrone A, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P1776, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00585.x
[78]   Leaf morphological analyses in four European oak species (Quercus) and their hybrids: A comparison of traditional and geometric morphometric methods [J].
Viscosi, V. ;
Lepais, O. ;
Gerber, S. ;
Fortini, P. .
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 2009, 143 (03) :564-574
[79]   DIAGNOSING UNITS OF CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT [J].
VOGLER, AP ;
DESALLE, R .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (02) :354-363
[80]   Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: Evidence from three genomes [J].
Wang, XQ ;
Tank, DC ;
Sang, T .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 17 (05) :773-781