Plant species delimitation: A comparison of morphological and molecular markers

被引:139
作者
Duminil, J. [1 ,2 ]
Di Michele, M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Serv Evolut Biol & Ecol, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Fac Univ Sci Agron Gembloux, Ecol Lab, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ, John Paul II Ctr High Technol Res & Educ Biomed S, Lab Analyt Tech & Prote, I-8610 Campobasso, Italy
[4] Univ Louvain, Ctr Mol & Vasc Biol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
来源
PLANT BIOSYSTEMS | 2009年 / 143卷 / 03期
关键词
Cluster analysis; phylogenetic relationships; proteomics; species concept; systematics; GENETIC-VARIATION; CAREX-FLAVA; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; ISOZYME VARIATION; DUBAUTIA-ARBOREA; D-CILIOLATA; COMPLEX; CONSERVATION; DIFFERENTIATION; ASTERACEAE;
D O I
10.1080/11263500902722964
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Species delimitation is fundamental in many areas of biology. Despite its importance, there is no agreement on criteria for species delimitation mostly due to divergence on the point of view adopted by the different biological disciplines. Two main groups of diagnostic characters are commonly used to distinguish species: the traditional morphological ones and the molecular ones. Field species recognition and sampling are generally based on morphological characters, but they can either fail to discriminate species and mask the presence of cryptic species or discriminate different species while in reality there is only one. To overcome this problem it is common to compare clusters obtained on the basis of the observed polymorphism of both characters, and to analyse their agreement. Here we compile a set of studies that have examined species delimitation with both markers. This provides a review of the different morphological and molecular markers, and of the sampling strategy and clustering methodology generally employed to delimitate species. Some conclusions are drawn with regard to species delimitation, when comparing diagnostic morphological and molecular markers.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 542
页数:15
相关论文
共 84 条
[41]   Genetic variation, breeding systems, and patterns of diversification in Hawaiian Polypodium (Polypodiaceae) [J].
Li, JW ;
Haufler, CH .
SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 1999, 24 (03) :339-355
[42]  
Lum JHK, 2002, PROTEOMICS, V2, P1123, DOI 10.1002/1615-9861(200209)2:9<1123::AID-PROT1123>3.0.CO
[43]  
2-S
[44]   Individual organisms as units of analysis: Bayesian-clustering alternatives in population genetics [J].
Mank, JE ;
Avise, JC .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 2004, 84 (03) :135-143
[45]  
Marquès K, 2001, PROTEOMICS, V1, P1457, DOI 10.1002/1615-9861(200111)1:11<1457::AID-PROT1457>3.0.CO
[46]  
2-W
[47]   Gene flow and genetic structure in the wild-weedy-domesticated complex of Phaseolus lunatus L. in its mesoamerican center of domestication and diversity [J].
Martinez-Castillo, Jaime ;
Zizumbo-Villarreal, Daniel ;
Gepts, Paul ;
Colunga-GarciaMarin, Patricia .
CROP SCIENCE, 2007, 47 (01) :58-66
[48]  
Mayr E., 1942, P1
[49]   DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy [J].
Miller, Scott E. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (12) :4775-4776
[50]   Molecular tests of the proposed diploid hybrid origin of Gilia achilleifolia (polemoniaceae) [J].
Morrell, PL ;
Rieseberg, LH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1998, 85 (10) :1439-1453