Single-centre study of 628 adult, primary kidney transplant recipients showing no unfavourable effect of new-onset diabetes after transplant

被引:28
作者
Gaynor, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
Ciancio, Gaetano [1 ]
Guerra, Giselle [2 ]
Sageshima, Junichiro [1 ]
Hanson, Lois [1 ]
Roth, David [2 ]
Goldstein, Michael J. [1 ]
Chen, Linda [1 ]
Kupin, Warren [2 ]
Mattiazzi, Adela [2 ]
Tueros, Lissett [1 ]
Flores, Sandra [1 ]
Barba, Luis J. [1 ]
Lopez, Adrian [1 ]
Rivas, Jose [1 ]
Ruiz, Phillip [1 ]
Vianna, Rodrigo [1 ]
Burke, George W., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Surg, Miami Transplant Inst, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Med, Miami Transplant Inst, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
Kidney transplantation; New-onset diabetes after transplant; Pretransplant diabetes mellitus; Prognostic impact; LONG-TERM TRIAL; DOSE MAINTENANCE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; PATIENT SURVIVAL; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; ACUTE REJECTION; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; INDUCTION ANTIBODIES; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-014-3428-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To better understand the implications of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), we used our prospectively followed cohort of 628 adult primary kidney transplant recipients to determine the prognostic impact of pretransplant diabetes and NODAT. The study cohort consisted of all participants in four randomised immunosuppression trials performed at our centre since May 2000. For each cause-specific hazard analysed, Cox stepwise regression was used to determine a multivariable model of significant baseline predictors; the multivariable influence of having pretransplant diabetes and NODAT (t) (the latter defined as a zero-one, time-dependent covariate) was subsequently tested. Similar analyses of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 36 and 60 months post transplant were performed using stepwise linear regression. Finally, a repeated measures analysis of mean HbA(1c) as a function of diabetes category (pretransplant diabetes vs NODAT) and randomised trial (first to fourth) was performed. Median follow-up was 56 months post transplant. Patients with pretransplant diabetes comprised 23.4% (147/628), and 22.5% (108/481) of the remaining patients developed NODAT. Pretransplant diabetes had no prognostic influence on first biopsy-proven acute rejection and death-censored graft failure hazard rates, nor on eGFR, but was associated with significantly higher rates of death with a functioning graft (DWFG) (p = 0.003), DWFG due to a cardiovascular event (p = 0.005) and infection that required hospitalisation (p = 0.03). NODAT (t) had no unfavourable impact on any of these hazard rates nor on eGFR, with actuarial freedom from DWFG remaining at over 90% among patients in pre- and post-NODAT states at 72 months post transplant/NODAT. Mean HbA(1c) for patients in the first to fourth randomised trials, averaged across diabetes category, decreased by trial (7.28%, 6.92%, 6.87% and 6.64% [56.1, 52.1, 51.6 and 49.1 mmol/mol], respectively; p = 0.02). Less-than-expected post-NODAT risk for graft loss and death may exist in the current climate of tighter glucose monitoring post transplant.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 345
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2011, DIABETES CARE, V34, pS11, DOI [10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc11-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc12-s011, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc10-S062, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc12-s064]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Clinical Diabetes, DOI [DOI 10.2337/DIACLIN.26.2.77, 10.2337/diaclin.26.2.77]
[3]   EFFECT OF GLYCEMIC CONTROL ON EARLY DIABETIC RENAL LESIONS - A 5-YEAR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETIC KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS [J].
BARBOSA, J ;
STEFFES, MW ;
SUTHERLAND, DER ;
CONNETT, JE ;
RAO, KV ;
MAUER, SM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (08) :600-606
[4]   Diabetes and atherosclerosis - Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management [J].
Beckman, JA ;
Creager, MA ;
Libby, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (19) :2570-2581
[5]   THE IMPACT OF CYCLOSPORINE AND COMBINATION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTTRANSPLANT DIABETES IN RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS [J].
BOUDREAUX, JP ;
MCHUGH, L ;
CANAFAX, DM ;
ASCHER, N ;
SUTHERLAND, DER ;
PAYNE, W ;
SIMMONS, RL ;
NAJARIAN, JS ;
FRYD, DS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1987, 44 (03) :376-381
[6]   Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral)/sirolimus in renal transplantation. II. Survival, function, and protocol compliance at 1 year [J].
Cianci, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Mattiazzi, A ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Nicolas, M ;
Ruiz, P ;
Rosen, A ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (02) :252-258
[7]   A Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: Three-year analysis [J].
Ciancio, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Ruiz, P ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Rosen, A ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (06) :845-852
[8]   A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: Early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring [J].
Ciancio, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Carreno, MR ;
Cirocco, RE ;
Mathew, JM ;
Mattiazzi, A ;
Cordovilla, T ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Rosen, A ;
Esquenazi, V ;
Tzakis, AG ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (04) :457-465
[9]   A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year [J].
Ciancio, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Mattiazzi, A ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Nicolas, M ;
Ruiz, P ;
Rosen, A ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (02) :244-251
[10]   Randomized Trial of Thymoglobulin Versus Alemtuzumab (with Lower Dose Maintenance Immunosuppression) Versus Daclizumab in Living Donor Renal Transplantation [J].
Ciancio, G. ;
Gaynor, J. J. ;
Roth, D. ;
Kupin, W. ;
Hanson, L. ;
Tueros, L. ;
Zarak, A. ;
Ruiz, P. ;
Burke, G. W., III .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (09) :3503-3506