Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research

被引:100
作者
Janes, Julia E. [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Sch Social Work, Fac Liberal Arts & Profess Studies, South Ross 8th floor,4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
Community-based participatory action research; postcolonial; democratic knowledge production; power; epistemology; CHALLENGES; REFLECTIONS; SUBALTERN; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1177/1476750315579129
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The literature suggests that community-based participatory research holds the potential to democratize and decolonize knowledge production by engaging communities and citizens in the research enterprise. Yet this approach, and its associated claims, remain under theorized, particularly as to how power circulates between and among academic and community knowledge work/ers. This paper puts forth a postcolonial analysis of participatory techniques that sustain academe's epistemic privilege through producing, subordinating and assimilating difference; claiming authenticity and voice; and dislocating collaborative knowledge work from the historical, political, social and embodied conditions in which it unfolds. Postcolonial readings of community-based participatory action research offer a powerful theoretical framework for interrogating the divide between the discursive claims and material practices that undermine this democratic project. Drawing on critical reflections on two community-based participatory action research projects, this paper offers modest proposals toward (re)placing community-based knowledge work/ers in space, time and bodies. Although this paper presents a critique of community-based participatory action research, it is not in pursuit of revealing bad participatory praxis or recuperating a better practice, but rather seeks to open up dialogue on the circulation of power in the campus/community encounter.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 87
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Photovoice: A Review of the Literature in Health and Public Health [J].
Catalani, Caricia ;
Minkler, Meredith .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2010, 37 (03) :424-451
[12]  
Chowdhury K, 2006, CULT CRIT, P126
[13]  
Cook B., 2001, Participation: A new tyranny?
[14]   Collaboration: Inter-subjectivity or radical pedagogy? [J].
Coombes, Brad .
CANADIAN GEOGRAPHER-GEOGRAPHE CANADIEN, 2012, 56 (02) :290-291
[15]   Action research literature 2008-2010: Themes and trends [J].
Dick, Bob .
ACTION RESEARCH, 2011, 9 (02) :122-143
[16]   Lessons From a Community-Based Participatory Research Project: Older People's and Researchers' Reflections [J].
Doyle, Martha ;
Timonen, Virpi .
RESEARCH ON AGING, 2010, 32 (02) :244-263
[17]   Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization [J].
Escobar, A .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 20 (02) :139-174
[18]   Who benefits from community-based participatory research? A case study of the Positive Youth Project [J].
Flicker, Sarah .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 35 (01) :70-86
[19]   Playing Dissymmetry in Action Research: The Role of Power and Differences in Promoting Participative Knowledge and Change [J].
Galuppo, Laura ;
Gorli, Mara ;
Ripamonti, Silvio .
SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2011, 24 (02) :147-164
[20]   Governing through community allegiance: a qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research [J].
Guta, Adrian ;
Flicker, Sarah ;
Roche, Brenda .
CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 23 (04) :432-451