Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis spore and crystal protein to resistant diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)

被引:95
|
作者
Tang, JD
Shelton, AM
VanRie, J
DeRoeck, S
Moar, WJ
Roush, RT
Peferoen, M
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV, NEW YORK STATE AGR EXPT STN, DEPT ENTOMOL, GENEVA, NY 14456 USA
[2] PLANT GENET SYST NV, B-9000 GHENT, BELGIUM
[3] AUBURN UNIV, DEPT ENTOMOL, AUBURN, AL 36849 USA
[4] CORNELL UNIV, DEPT ENTOMOL, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.62.2.564-569.1996
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A colony of Plutella xylostella from crucifer fields in Florida was used in mortality bioassays with HD-1 spore, CryIA(a), CryIA(b), CryIA(c), CryIB, CryIC, CryID, CryIE, or CryIIA. The data revealed high levels of field-evolved resistance to HD-1 spore and all CryIA protoxins and no resistance to CryIB, CryIC, or CryID. CryIE and CryIIA were essentially not toxic. When HD-1 spore was combined 1:1 with protoxin and fed to susceptible larvae, spore synergized the activity of CryIA and CryIC 5- to 8-fold and 1.7-fold, respectively, and did not synergize the mortality of CryIIA. When fed to Florida larvae, spore failed to synergize the activity of all three CryIA protoxins, synergized the activity of CryIC 5.3-fold, and did not synergize the mortality for CryIIA. Binding studies with CryIA(b), CryIB, and CryIC were performed to determine possible mechanisms of resistance. The two techniques used were (i) binding of biotinylated toxin to tissue sections of larval midguts and (ii) binding of biotinylated toxin to brush border membrane vesicles prepared from whole larvae. Both showed dramatically reduced binding of CryIA(b) in resistant larvae compared with that in susceptible larvae but no differences in binding of CryIB or CryIC.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 569
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Isothiocyanates Stimulating Oviposition by the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella
    J. Alan A. Renwick
    Meena Haribal
    Sandrine Gouinguené
    Erich Städler
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2006, 32 : 755 - 766
  • [42] Susceptibility of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), from collard fields in South Carolina to Bacillus thuringiensis
    Khan, MFR
    Griffin, RP
    Carner, GR
    Gorsuch, CS
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND URBAN ENTOMOLOGY, 2005, 22 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [43] Isothiocyanates stimulating oviposition by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella
    Renwick, J. Alan A.
    Haribal, Meena
    Gouinguene, Sandrine
    Staedler, Erich
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 32 (04) : 755 - 766
  • [44] Optimization of pheromone dispensers for diamondback moth Plutella xylostella
    Mottus, E
    Nomm, V
    Williams, IH
    Liblikas, I
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1997, 23 (09) : 2145 - 2159
  • [45] A single type of cadherin is involved in Bacillus thuringiensis toxicity in Plutella xylostella
    Park, Y.
    Herrero, S.
    Kim, Y.
    INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2015, 24 (06) : 624 - 633
  • [46] Optimization of Pheromone Dispensers for Diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella
    E. Môttus
    V. Nômm
    I. H. Williams
    I. Liblikas
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1997, 23 : 2145 - 2159
  • [47] Identification of predation by spiders on the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella
    Quan, Xiaoyu
    Wu, Lingbing
    Zhou, Qingping
    Yun, Yueli
    Peng, Yu
    Chen, Jian
    BULLETIN OF INSECTOLOGY, 2011, 64 (02): : 223 - 227
  • [48] Protogyny in Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae).
    Uematsu, H
    Morikawa, R
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY AND ZOOLOGY, 1997, 41 (04) : 217 - 223
  • [49] Optimization of Pheromone Dispensers for Diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella
    Mottus, E.
    Nomm, V.
    Williams, I. H.
    Liblikas, I.
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23 (09):
  • [50] Potentiality of intercropping in managing Diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)
    Sharma, Kuldeep
    Mahla, M. K.
    Babu, S. Ramesh
    Ahir, K. C.
    Kumar, A.
    Singh, Beerendra
    Cheema, Rupinder Singh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 92 (08): : 1010 - 1014