Rubric Use in Technical Communication: Exploring the Process of Creating Valid and Reliable Assessment Tools

被引:16
作者
Boettger, Ryan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Texas, Dept Linguist & Tech Commun, Denton, TX 76203 USA
关键词
Assessment; interrater reliability; rubrics; writing assessment; WRITING ASSESSMENT; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1109/TPC.2009.2038733
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Assessing the quality of student efforts and products is a continual necessity for academics and practitioners in technical communication; however, the process of constructing valid and reliable rubrics remains an underexplored topic in the field. This paper first addresses some of the assessment concerns and then describes a case study that documents the development and implementation of one holistic and five analytic rubrics to evaluate undergraduate projects. The discussion focuses on identifying site-specific criteria and training effective raters and is intended to help academics respond to their required accreditation mandates and offer practitioners alternatives for evaluating products and services.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 17
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
ABBUHL R, 2005, ED ADV FOREIGN LANGU
[2]  
Allen J., 2004, TECH COMMUN Q, V13, P93
[3]  
Allen Jo., 1993, TECH COMMUN Q, V2, P365
[4]  
Arter J., 2001, SCORING RUBRICS CLAS
[5]  
Beach Richard., 1992, Methods and Methodology in Composition Research
[6]  
Brookhart S.M., 2004, Grading
[7]  
Brown G.T. L., 2004, Assessing Writing, V9, P105, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ASW.2004.07.001
[8]  
CHARNEY D, 1984, RES TEACH ENGL, V18, P65
[9]  
Charney D, 2002, C S TECH CO, P111
[10]  
Cherry R.D., 1993, Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment: Theoretical and empirical foundations, P109