Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with low re-excision rates following breast conserving surgery for non-palpable invasive breast cancers

被引:3
作者
Baliski, Christopher [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Jay, Michael [2 ]
Hamm, Jeremy [3 ]
机构
[1] BC Canc Kelowna, Dept Surg Oncol, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Northern British Columbia, Northern Med Program, Prince George, BC, Canada
[3] BC Canc, Canc Surveillance & Outcomes, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] UBC Dept Surg, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[5] UBC Dept Surg, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Breast cancer; Intraoperative ultrasound; Re-excision; Calculated resection ratio; Hydromark;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.055
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Wire localized breast biopsy (WLB) is the most commonly performed procedure for the removal of non-palpable breast cancer. It is associated with patient discomfort and high re-excision rates. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is an alternative technique that may improve patient experience and have lower re-excision rates. Methods: A retrospective, single surgeon experience with IOUS is compared with WLB. Case matching for variables known to impact re-excision rates is performed. Fisher's exact test was performed for categorical variables, and a T-test for continuous variables. Results: 28 patients underwent IOUS and WLB. Re-excision rates were the same in patients undergoing IOUS and WLB (10.7% vs 0%; p = 0.24). The calculated resection ratio was lower with IOUS than WLB (2.99 vs 3.46; p = 0.37), but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: In selected patients, intra-operative ultrasound can be performed with a favourable re-excision rate, and comparable amounts of tissue compared to wire localized breast biopsy. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1166
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Lowering Re-excision Rates After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Unraveling the Intersection Between Surgeon Case Volumes and Techniques
    Baliski, Christopher
    Hughes, Lauren
    Bakos, Brendan
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 894 - 901
  • [2] Use of Hydrogel Breast Biopsy Tissue Markers Reduces the Need for Wire Localization
    Blumencranz, Peter W.
    Ellis, Debra
    Barlowe, Kylee
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (10) : 3273 - 3277
  • [3] Eggemann Holm, 2016, Clin Breast Cancer, V16, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.09.001
  • [4] Hu X, 2020, J INT MED RES, V48
  • [5] Intraoperative Ultrasound Versus Mammographic Needle Localization for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    James, T. A.
    Harlow, S.
    Sheehey-Jones, J.
    Hart, M.
    Gaspari, C.
    Stanley, M.
    Krag, D.
    Ashikaga, Takamaru
    McCahill, L. E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 1164 - 1169
  • [6] Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Langhans, Linnea
    Jensen, Maj-Britt
    Talman, Maj-Lis M.
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Kroman, Niels
    Tvedskov, Tove F.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (04) : 378 - 384
  • [7] Impact of SSO-ASTRO margin guidelines on reoperation rates following breast-conserving surgery
    Monaghan, Alex
    Chapinal, Nuria
    Hughes, Lauren
    Baliski, Christopher
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 217 (05) : 862 - 867
  • [8] Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance Is Associated with Clear Lumpectomy Margins for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Hong
    Wu, Naping
    Ding, Hao
    Ding, Qiang
    Dai, Juncheng
    Ling, Lijun
    Chen, Lin
    Zha, Xiaoming
    Liu, Xiaoan
    Zhou, Wenbin
    Wang, Shui
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [9] Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast lesions
    Snider, HC
    Morrison, DG
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 6 (03) : 308 - 314