Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution

被引:337
作者
Sathre, Roger [1 ]
O'Connor, Jennifer [2 ]
机构
[1] Mid Sweden Univ, S-83125 Ostersund, Sweden
[2] FPInnovat Forintek, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
关键词
Climate change mitigation; Displacement factor; Forest products; Greenhouse gas; Meta-analysis; Wood substitution; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION; FOREST; ENERGY; EMISSIONS; CONCRETE; BALANCES; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A displacement factor can express the efficiency of using biomass to reduce net greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, by quantifying the amount of emission reduction achieved per unit of wood use. Here we integrate data from 21 different international studies in a meta-analysis of the displacement factors of wood products substituted in place of non-wood materials. We calculate the displacement factors in consistent units of tons of carbon (tC) of emission reduction per tC in wood product. The displacement factors range from a low of -2.3 to a high of 15, with most lying in the range of 1.0 to 3.0. The average displacement factor value is 2.1, meaning that for each tC in wood products substituted in place of non-wood products, there occurs an average GHG emission reduction of approximately 2.1 tC. Expressed in other units, this value corresponds to roughly 3.9 t CO2 eq emission reduction per ton of dry wood used. The few cases of negative displacement factors are the result of worst-case scenarios that are unrealistic in current practice. This meta-analysis quantifies the range of GHG benefits of wood substitution, and provides a clear climate rationale for increasing wood substitution in place of other products, provided that forests are sustainably managed and that wood residues are used responsibly. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 114
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Aulisi A., 2008, TREES GREENHOUSE WHY
[2]   Greenhouse gas balances in building construction:: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives [J].
Börjesson, P ;
Gustavsson, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) :575-588
[3]  
Buchanan A.H., 1999, Environmental Science Policy, V2, P427, DOI [10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00038-6, DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00038-6]
[4]   Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution [J].
Eriksson, Erik ;
Gillespie, Andrew R. ;
Gustavsson, Leif ;
Langvall, Ola ;
Olsson, Mats ;
Sathre, Roger ;
Stendahl, Johan .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2007, 37 (03) :671-681
[5]  
*FRANKL ASS, 2004, 0403 NAT COUNC AIR S, P63
[6]   Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction [J].
Gustavsson, L. ;
Holmberg, J. ;
Dornburg, V. ;
Sathre, R. ;
Eggers, T. ;
Mahapatra, K. ;
Marland, G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (11) :5671-5691
[7]   Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: Comparing concrete- and wood-framed buildings [J].
Gustavsson L. ;
Pingoud K. ;
Sathre R. .
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2006, 11 (3) :667-691
[8]   Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials [J].
Gustavsson, L ;
Sathre, R .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 41 (07) :940-951
[9]  
IPCC, 2007, Mitigation of climate change
[10]  
John S., 2009, Environmental impacts of multistory buildings using different construction materials