Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from the RELAX trial

被引:129
|
作者
DeVore, Adam D. [1 ,2 ]
McNulty, Steven [1 ]
Alenezi, Fawaz [2 ]
Ersboll, Mads [3 ]
Vader, Justin M. [4 ]
Oh, Jae K. [5 ]
Lin, Grace [5 ]
Redfield, Margaret M. [5 ]
Lewis, Gregory [6 ]
Semigran, Marc J. [6 ]
Anstrom, Kevin J. [1 ,2 ]
Hernandez, Adrian F. [1 ,2 ]
Velazquez, Eric J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, 2400 Pratt St,NP-8064, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] Univ Hosp Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol, Ctr Heart, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Heart failure; Echocardiography; Strain; EXERCISE CAPACITY; VASCULAR FUNCTION; SYSTOLIC FUNCTION; CLINICAL STATUS; DIAGNOSIS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PERFORMANCE; INHIBITION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1002/ejhf.754
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundWhile abnormal left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been described in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), its prevalence and clinical significance are poorly understood. Methods and resultsPatients enrolled in the RELAX trial of sildenafil in HFpEF (LV ejection fraction 50%) in whom two-dimensional, speckle-tracking LV GLS was possible (n=187) were analysed. The distribution of LV GLS and its associations with clinical characteristics, LV structure and function, biomarkers, exercise capacity and quality of life were assessed. Baseline median LV GLS was -14.6% (25th and 75th percentile, -17.0% and -11.9%, respectively) and abnormal (-16%) in 122/187 (65%) patients. Patients in the tertile with the best LV GLS had lower N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) [median 505pg/mL (161, 1065) vs. 875pg/mL (488, 1802), P=0.008) and lower collagen IIIN-terminal propeptide (PIIINP) levels [median 6.7 mu g/L (5.1, 8.1) vs. 8.1 mu g/L (6.5, 10.5), P=0.001] compared with the tertile with the worst LV GLS. There was also a modest linear relationship with LV GLS and log-transformed NT-proBNP and PIIINP (r=0.29, P<0.001 and r=0.19, P=0.009, respectively). We observed no linear association of LV GLS with Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scores, 6-min walk distance, peak oxygen consumption, or expiratory minute ventilation/carbon dioxide excretion slope. ConclusionsImpaired LV GLS is common among HFpEF patients, indicating the presence of covert systolic dysfunction despite normal LV ejection fraction. Impaired LV GLS was associated with biomarkers of wall stress and collagen synthesis and diastolic dysfunction but not with quality of life or exercise capacity, suggesting other processes may be more responsible for these aspects of the HFpEF syndrome.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 900
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Renal Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the RELAX Trial
    Patel, Ravi B.
    Mehta, Rupal
    Redfield, Margaret M.
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    Dubin, Ruth F.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (03) : 233 - 242
  • [2] Biomarker Profile of Left Atrial Myopathy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the RELAX Trial
    Patel, Ravi B.
    Alenezi, Fawaz
    Sun, Jie-Lena
    Alhanti, Brooke
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Oh, Jae K.
    Redfield, Margaret M.
    Butler, Javed
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Velazquez, Eric J.
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (03) : 270 - 275
  • [3] Predictors of Impaired Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Patients with Essential Hypertension and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Noori, Ahmed A.
    Barzani, Mudhafar A.
    OPEN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16
  • [4] Usefulness and clinical relevance of left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Tschoepe, Carsten
    Senni, Michele
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2020, 25 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [5] Serelaxin in acute heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the RELAX-AHF trial
    Filippatos, Gerasimos
    Teerlink, John R.
    Farmakis, Dimitrios
    Cotter, Gad
    Davison, Beth A.
    Felker, G. Michael
    Greenberg, Barry H.
    Hua, Tsushung
    Ponikowski, Piotr
    Severin, Thomas
    Unemori, Elaine
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    Metra, Marco
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (16) : 1041 - 1050
  • [6] Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
    Petutschnigg, Johannes
    Edelmann, Frank
    INTERNIST, 2019, 60 (09): : 925 - 942
  • [7] Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: outcomes following an acute heart failure hospitalization
    Buggey, Jonathan
    Alenezi, Fawaz
    Yoon, Hyun Ju
    Phelan, Matthew
    DeVore, Adam D.
    Khouri, Michel G.
    Schulte, Phillip J.
    Velazquez, Eric J.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2017, 4 (04): : 432 - 439
  • [8] Usefulness and clinical relevance of left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Carsten Tschöpe
    Michele Senni
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2020, 25 : 67 - 73
  • [9] Role of global longitudinal strain in assessment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Bshiebish, Hasanain Ali Hameed
    Al-Musawi, Ali Hussein
    Khudeir, Safaa Ali
    JOURNAL OF THE SAUDI HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 31 (02) : 100 - 105
  • [10] Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain Provides Prognostic Value Incremental to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Heart Failure
    Motoki, Hirohiko
    Borowski, Allen G.
    Shrestha, Kevin
    Hu, Bo
    Kusunose, Kenya
    Troughton, Richard W.
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    Klein, Allan L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2014, 27 (07) : 726 - 732