Induction Motor Drive Direct Torque Control and Predictive Torque Control Comparison Based on Switching Pattern Analysis

被引:24
作者
Karlovsky, Pavel [1 ]
Lettl, Jiri [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Elect Engn, Dept Elect Drives & Tract, Prague 16627, Czech Republic
关键词
direct torque control; model predictive control; induction motor drive; voltage source inverter; switching patterns; MODEL; INVERTER;
D O I
10.3390/en11071793
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper describes a switching pattern generated in case of induction motor drive predictive torque control (PTC) compared to a switching pattern of direct torque control (DTC). PTC is a modern control method for electric drives based on model predictive control (MPC). DTC is a very powerful method and is today an industrial standard for controlling an induction motor drive. Its usage is wide-spread, mainly in high-power applications. However, the method suffers from a few disadvantages. One of the causes of the control method's problematic behavior is choosing the switching combinations in the flux sector. Another inconvenience is the common selection table not including all voltage vectors in given sector. By these factors, the ripples of flux vector trajectory and torque waveforms are influenced. The longer the sample time is, the more significant the influence of factors becomes, because only a few steps occur within one turn of the magnetic flux vector. Based on the detailed analysis, the reasons of the different performance of both systems are explained. The analysis performed by simulation in Matlab Simulink environment has proved that, while DTC might choose voltage vector that pushes system away from the reference values, the MPC always chooses the most proper vector. The experimental results measured on the real drive confirm the appropriate vector selection, just in case of the predictive control method.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Ajlan A, 2017, 2017 3RD IEEE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY CONVERSION (CENCON), P139, DOI 10.1109/CENCON.2017.8262473
[2]  
Alsofyani IM, 2015, 2015 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY CONVERSION (CENCON), P368, DOI 10.1109/CENCON.2015.7409571
[3]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE JOURNAL OF E
[4]   Multistep Model Predictive Control for Cascaded H-Bridge Inverters: Formulation and Analysis [J].
Baidya, Roky ;
Aguilera, Ricardo P. ;
Acuna, Pablo ;
Vazquez, Sergio ;
Mouton, Hendrik du Toit .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2018, 33 (01) :876-886
[5]   Predictive Direct Torque Control for Flux and Torque Ripple Reduction [J].
Beerten, Jef ;
Verveckken, Jan ;
Driesen, Johan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2010, 57 (01) :404-412
[6]  
Bose B.K., 2002, MODERN POWER ELECT A
[7]  
Bouhoune K, 2017, MED C CONTR AUTOMAT, P577, DOI 10.1109/MED.2017.7984179
[8]  
Bouzidi Riad, 2016, Mediterranean Journal of Measurement and Control, V12, P561
[9]   Direct torque control of PWM inverter-fed AC motors - A survey [J].
Buja, GS ;
Kazmierkowski, MP .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2004, 51 (04) :744-757
[10]   Predictive torque control for inverter-fed induction machines [J].
Correa, Pablo ;
Pacas, Mario ;
Rodriguez, Jose .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2007, 54 (02) :1073-1079