Clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis for advanced ankle arthritis A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
作者
Bai, Zixing [1 ]
Yang, Yanjun [1 ]
Chen, Si [1 ]
Dong, Yongli [1 ]
Cao, Xuhan [1 ]
Qin, Weikai [1 ]
Sun, Weidong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Acad Chinese Med Sci, Wangjing Hosp, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
advanced ankle arthritis; ankle joint; arthroscopy; fusion; open;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000024998
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Ankle fusion is the primary treatment for advanced ankle arthritis. With the advancement of arthroscopy technology, ankle arthroscopy fusion has shown many advantages over traditional surgery. However, there are few related studies globally, and evidence-based medicine is needed to verify the reliability and feasibility of ankle arthroscopy fusion. Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis and open ankle arthrodesis. Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], Wanfang Database, and VIP Database for published prospective or retrospective controlled studies of arthroscopic-assisted ankle fusion in the treatment of advanced ankle arthritis. The dates were limited from the construction of the library to June 30, 2019. Literature was included based on the principles and methods of evidence-based medicine. Literature retrieval, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers using the Cochrane 5.1 risk bias assessment tool. The methodological bias of the literature was evaluated, and a meta-analysis was using by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 18 studies and 1102 patients were included in the study, including 551 in the arthroscopic surgery group and 551 in the open surgery group. Arthroscopy-assisted surgery for advanced ankle arthritis was more effective than open surgery in terms of fusion rate (odd ratio[OR] = 3.32, 95% confidence interval[CI]:2.16, 5.10), fusion time (mean difference[MD] = -2.31, 95% CI:-4.63, -2.21), intraoperative blood loss (MD = -43.37, 95%CI: -48.49, -38.25), hospital stay (MD = -1.80, 95%CI: -2.28, -1.33), and visual analog scale score (MD = -1.75, 95%CI: -2.04, -1.46). In addition, rate of complications (OR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.52) was superior to open ankle fusion (P < .00001). Conclusion: Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has more advantages than open ankle arthrodesis in improving the fusion rate and reducing complications, which is worthy of clinical application. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020195727.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   THE OPTIMUM POSITION OF ARTHRODESIS OF THE ANKLE - A GAIT STUDY OF THE KNEE AND ANKLE [J].
BUCK, P ;
MORREY, BF ;
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (07) :1052-1062
[2]  
Chenglong L., 2010, CHIN J REPARAT RECON, V24, P1530
[3]   The Anatomic Compression Arthrodesis Technique with Anterior Plate Augmentation for Ankle Arthrodesis [J].
Clare, Michael P. ;
Sanders, Roy W. .
FOOT AND ANKLE CLINICS, 2011, 16 (01) :91-101
[4]  
[段小军 Duan Xiaojun], 2013, [中华骨科杂志, Chinese Journal of Orthopedics], V33, P403
[5]  
Garras DN., 2010, SEMIN ARTHROPLASTY, V21, P230
[6]   Arthrodesis of the Infected Ankle Joint: Results with the Ilizarov External Fixator [J].
Gessmann, J. ;
Oezokyay, L. ;
Fehmer, T. ;
Muhr, G. ;
Seybold, D. .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2011, 149 (02) :212-218
[7]  
Guanggang Y., 2016, CHIN J MOD DRUG APPL, V10, P60
[8]  
Guocheng L, 2018, DIABETES WORLD, V15, P173
[9]  
Jianhua W, 2018, CLIN RES PRACT, V3, P74
[10]  
Jie S., 2018, CLIN J MED OFFICERS, V46, P1320