Risk-based decompositions of the meta profit efficiency of Taiwanese and Chinese banks

被引:30
作者
Fu, Tsu-Tan [1 ]
Juo, Jia-Ching [2 ]
Chiang, Han-Chin [1 ]
Yu, Ming-Miin [3 ]
Huang, Mei-ying [4 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Dept Econ, 56,Sect 1,Kueiyang St, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[2] Lunghwa Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Int Business, 300,Section1,Wanshou Rd Guishan Dist, Taoyuan 33306, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Dept Transportat Sci, 2 Beining Rd, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Econ, 151 Univ Rd San Shia Dist, New Taipei 23741, Taiwan
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2016年 / 62卷
关键词
Metafrontier; Risk; Nerlovian profit measurement; Profit inefficiency and gap; Equity capital; DISTANCE FUNCTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study measures the profit efficiencies of Taiwanese and Chinese banks with the assumption that both types could operate under the metafrontier. To consider the risk consideration of banks, we include equity capital as a quasi-fixed input and develop the risk-based measures of the meta Nerlovian profit efficiency. We further decompose meta profit efficiency and gap into technology and allocative efficiencies and gaps. We use 34 Taiwanese banks and 70 Chinese banks in 2011 to empirically measure profit efficiency and its decompositions. Empirical results show that the Chinese state-owned banks perform the best in meta profit efficiency, followed by Chinese joint-equity banks and Taiwanese state-owned banks. These three types of banks are performing better than the other types of banks in Taiwan and China. We also find that Taiwanese private banks perform better in profit and technical efficiencies versus Chinese city banks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 46
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMP EFFICIENCY EURO
[2]  
[Anonymous], OMEGA
[3]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[4]  
Berger A.N., 2007, Financial Markets, Institutions Instruments, V16, P119, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0416.2007.00121.X
[5]   Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? [J].
Berger, AN ;
Mester, LJ .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1997, 21 (07) :895-947
[6]   Benefit and distance functions [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 70 (02) :407-419
[7]   Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency [J].
Chambers, RG ;
Chung, Y ;
Fare, R .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 98 (02) :351-364
[8]   A cross-country comparison of productivity growth using the generalised metafrontier Malmquist productivity index: with application to banking industries in Taiwan and China [J].
Chen, Ku-Hsieh ;
Yang, Hao-Yen .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2011, 35 (03) :197-212
[9]   The effect of risk-based capital requirements on profit efficiency in banking [J].
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Weber, WL .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (15) :1731-1743
[10]   Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey [J].
Fethi, Meryem Duygun ;
Pasiouras, Fotios .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 204 (02) :189-198