A Cross-Linguistic Study of Individual Differences in Speech Planning

被引:10
作者
Swets, Benjamin [1 ]
Fuchs, Susanne [2 ]
Krivokapic, Jelena [3 ,4 ]
Petrone, Caterina [5 ]
机构
[1] Grand Valley State Univ, Allendale, MI 49401 USA
[2] Leibniz Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissensch, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Linguist, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Haskins Labs Inc, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix En Provence, France
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
speech planning; incrementality; crosslinguistic; individual difference; working memory; speed of processing; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; SENTENCE PRODUCTION; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; WORD-ORDER; SCOPE; LENGTH; FLEXIBILITY; FORMULATION; COMPLEXITY; SPEAKERS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655516
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although previous research has shown that there exist individual and cross-linguistic differences in planning strategies during language production, little is known about how such individual differences might vary depending on which language a speaker is planning. The present series of studies examines individual differences in planning strategies exhibited by speakers of American English, French, and German. Participants were asked to describe images on a computer monitor while their eye movements were monitored. In addition, we measured participants' working memory capacity and speed of processing. The results indicate that in the present study, English and German were planned less incrementally (further in advance) prior to speech onset compared to French, which was planned more incrementally (not as far in advance). Crucially, speed of processing predicted the scope of planning for French speakers, but not for English or German speakers. These results suggest that the different planning strategies that are invoked by syntactic choices available in different languages are associated with the tendency for speakers to rely on different cognitive support systems as they plan sentences.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   A Common Neural Substrate for Language Production and Verbal Working Memory [J].
Acheson, Daniel J. ;
Hamidi, Massihullah ;
Binder, Jeffrey R. ;
Postle, Bradley R. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (06) :1358-1367
[2]   Verbal Working Memory and Language Production: Common Approaches to the Serial Ordering of Verbal Information [J].
Acheson, Daniel J. ;
MacDonald, Maryellen C. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 135 (01) :50-68
[3]   Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units [J].
Allum, Paul H. ;
Wheeldon, Linda R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (04) :791-810
[4]   The word order of languages predicts native speakers' working memory [J].
Amici, Federica ;
Sanchez-Amaro, Alex ;
Sebastian-Enesco, Carla ;
Cacchione, Trix ;
Allritz, Matthias ;
Salazar-Bonet, Juan ;
Rossano, Federico .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
[5]  
Baayen R.H., 2008, ANALYSING LINGUISTIC, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
[6]   Working memory [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :R136-R140
[7]   Exploring the Similarity Between Implicit and Explicit Prosody: Prosodic Phrasing and Individual Differences [J].
Bishop, Jason .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2021, 64 (04) :873-899
[8]  
Bishop Jason., 2020, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, P2020, DOI DOI 10.21437/SPEECHPROSODY.2020-39
[9]  
Boersma P., 2018, Praat: Doing phonetics by the computer
[10]   Little houses and casas pequenas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish [J].
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah ;
Konopka, Agnieszka E. .
COGNITION, 2008, 109 (02) :274-280