Communication with fertility patients during the COVID-19 pandemic- let's talk about it

被引:7
作者
Karavani, Gilad [1 ,2 ]
Chill, Henry H. [1 ,2 ]
Meirman, Cherut [3 ]
Dior, Uri P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ben-Meir, Assaf [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hadassah Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Hadassah Med Ctr, Infertil & IVF Unit, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
COVID-19; Telemedicine; In-vitro fertilization clinic; TELEMEDICINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity of a tertiary fertility service and compare telemedicine and face-to-face meetings during this time. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. Included were patients scheduled for an appointment in the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) unit between March 18th and April 15th. A comparison was made between patients who chose telemedicine as opposed to face-to-face meetings. Additionally, the population of patients who chose to cancel their appointment was characterized. IVF cycle outcomes were additionally compared between the groups. Results: Overall, 90 IVF clinic appointments were scheduled during the study period. Thirty-four (37.8 %) patients chose to arrive to the clinic in spite of the COVID 19 pandemic and partial quarantine, 27 (30.0 %) patients chose to avoid in person meeting and scheduled a telemedicine appointment and 29 (32.2 %) patients cancelled their appointment. On comparison between patients who chose telemedicine vs. face-to-face meeting, the telemedicine group had lower prevalence of primary infertility (20.0 % vs. 47.1 %, p = 0.037) and higher rates of preimplantation genetic testing indication for in-vitro fertilization (48.2 % vs. 20.6 %, p = 0.026). Rate of a first-ever clinic visit was higher in patients that arrived for a face-to-face meeting, as compared to telemedicine encounter (55.9 % vs. 28.0 %, respectively; p = 0.036). Patients that opted to avoid attending the clinic or meeting via telemedicine had higher rates of medical comorbidities compared to patients who chose to attend their appointment (51.7 % vs. 29.5 %, p = 0.016). Rate of appointments that led to fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer and these transfers' outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate) were similar in the telemedicine and face-to-face meeting groups (72.2 % vs. 88.0 % and 30.8 % vs. 31.8 %, p = 0.73 and p = 1.00; respectively). Conclusion: Telemedicine is a valuable tool for delivering fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is need to determine which patients will benefit most from this modality. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 158
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] ASRM, 2020, Patient management and clinical recommendations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic
  • [2] Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies
    Boivin, J.
    Griffiths, E.
    Venetis, C. A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342 : 481
  • [3] Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records
    Chen, Huijun
    Guo, Juanjuan
    Wang, Chen
    Luo, Fan
    Yu, Xuechen
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Jiafu
    Zhao, Dongchi
    Xu, Dan
    Gong, Qing
    Liao, Jing
    Yang, Huixia
    Hou, Wei
    Zhang, Yuanzhen
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10226) : 809 - 815
  • [4] Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC), 2020, The Epidemiological Characteristics of an Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID-19)-China, 2020
  • [5] Telemonitoring in IVF/ICSI
    Gerris, Jan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 160 - 167
  • [6] Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring versus traditional monitoring of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: an RCT
    Gerris, Jan
    Delvigne, Annick
    Dhont, Nathalie
    Vandekerckhove, Frank
    Madoc, Bo
    Buyle, Magaly
    Neyskens, Julie
    Deschepper, Ellen
    De Bacquer, Dirk
    Pil, Lore
    Annemans, Lieven
    Verpoest, Willem
    De Sutter, Petra
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (09) : 1941 - 1948
  • [7] Impact of telemedicine on assisted reproduction treatment in the public health system
    Hernandez, C.
    Valdera, C. J.
    Cordero, J.
    Lopez, E.
    Plaza, J.
    Albi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 35 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [8] The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review
    Jiang, Xinchan
    Ming, Wai-Kit
    You, Joyce H. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (06)
  • [9] Novel corona virus disease (COVID-19) in pregnancy: What clinical recommendations to follow?
    Liang, Huan
    Acharya, Ganesh
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (04) : 439 - 442
  • [10] Telemedicine Technologies for Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ming, Wai-Kit
    Mackillop, Lucy H.
    Farmer, Andrew J.
    Loerup, Lise
    Bartlett, Katy
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    Tarassenko, Lionel
    Velardo, Carmelo
    Kenworthy, Yvonne
    Hirst, Jane E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (11)