Communication with fertility patients during the COVID-19 pandemic- let's talk about it

被引:7
作者
Karavani, Gilad [1 ,2 ]
Chill, Henry H. [1 ,2 ]
Meirman, Cherut [3 ]
Dior, Uri P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ben-Meir, Assaf [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hadassah Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Hadassah Med Ctr, Infertil & IVF Unit, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
COVID-19; Telemedicine; In-vitro fertilization clinic; TELEMEDICINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity of a tertiary fertility service and compare telemedicine and face-to-face meetings during this time. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a university affiliated tertiary medical center. Included were patients scheduled for an appointment in the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) unit between March 18th and April 15th. A comparison was made between patients who chose telemedicine as opposed to face-to-face meetings. Additionally, the population of patients who chose to cancel their appointment was characterized. IVF cycle outcomes were additionally compared between the groups. Results: Overall, 90 IVF clinic appointments were scheduled during the study period. Thirty-four (37.8 %) patients chose to arrive to the clinic in spite of the COVID 19 pandemic and partial quarantine, 27 (30.0 %) patients chose to avoid in person meeting and scheduled a telemedicine appointment and 29 (32.2 %) patients cancelled their appointment. On comparison between patients who chose telemedicine vs. face-to-face meeting, the telemedicine group had lower prevalence of primary infertility (20.0 % vs. 47.1 %, p = 0.037) and higher rates of preimplantation genetic testing indication for in-vitro fertilization (48.2 % vs. 20.6 %, p = 0.026). Rate of a first-ever clinic visit was higher in patients that arrived for a face-to-face meeting, as compared to telemedicine encounter (55.9 % vs. 28.0 %, respectively; p = 0.036). Patients that opted to avoid attending the clinic or meeting via telemedicine had higher rates of medical comorbidities compared to patients who chose to attend their appointment (51.7 % vs. 29.5 %, p = 0.016). Rate of appointments that led to fresh or frozen-thawed embryo transfer and these transfers' outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate) were similar in the telemedicine and face-to-face meeting groups (72.2 % vs. 88.0 % and 30.8 % vs. 31.8 %, p = 0.73 and p = 1.00; respectively). Conclusion: Telemedicine is a valuable tool for delivering fertility care during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is need to determine which patients will benefit most from this modality. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 158
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ASRM-American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2020, Patient management and clinical recommendations during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic
[2]   Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies [J].
Boivin, J. ;
Griffiths, E. ;
Venetis, C. A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342 :481
[3]   Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records [J].
Chen, Huijun ;
Guo, Juanjuan ;
Wang, Chen ;
Luo, Fan ;
Yu, Xuechen ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Li, Jiafu ;
Zhao, Dongchi ;
Xu, Dan ;
Gong, Qing ;
Liao, Jing ;
Yang, Huixia ;
Hou, Wei ;
Zhang, Yuanzhen .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10226) :809-815
[4]  
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC), 2020, China CDC Weekly 2020
[5]   Telemonitoring in IVF/ICSI [J].
Gerris, Jan .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) :160-167
[6]   Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring versus traditional monitoring of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: an RCT [J].
Gerris, Jan ;
Delvigne, Annick ;
Dhont, Nathalie ;
Vandekerckhove, Frank ;
Madoc, Bo ;
Buyle, Magaly ;
Neyskens, Julie ;
Deschepper, Ellen ;
De Bacquer, Dirk ;
Pil, Lore ;
Annemans, Lieven ;
Verpoest, Willem ;
De Sutter, Petra .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (09) :1941-1948
[7]   Impact of telemedicine on assisted reproduction treatment in the public health system [J].
Hernandez, C. ;
Valdera, C. J. ;
Cordero, J. ;
Lopez, E. ;
Plaza, J. ;
Albi, M. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 35 (01) :27-34
[8]   The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review [J].
Jiang, Xinchan ;
Ming, Wai-Kit ;
You, Joyce H. S. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (06)
[9]   Novel corona virus disease (COVID-19) in pregnancy: What clinical recommendations to follow? [J].
Liang, Huan ;
Acharya, Ganesh .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (04) :439-442
[10]   Telemedicine Technologies for Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Ming, Wai-Kit ;
Mackillop, Lucy H. ;
Farmer, Andrew J. ;
Loerup, Lise ;
Bartlett, Katy ;
Levy, Jonathan C. ;
Tarassenko, Lionel ;
Velardo, Carmelo ;
Kenworthy, Yvonne ;
Hirst, Jane E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (11)