New conceptual framework for flood risk assessment in Sheffield, UK

被引:8
|
作者
Chen, I-Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Dept Nat & Built Environm, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
disaster resilience; flood; GIS; regeneration; risk assessment; Sheffield; UK; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; METRO SYSTEMS; RIVER-BASIN; MODEL; GIS; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT; EXPOSURE; DISTRICT;
D O I
10.1111/1745-5871.12478
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This study explores a new framework of flood risk assessment that considers four components, namely hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and community resilience. The key variables and coefficients were selected using principal component analysis and geographically weighted regression (GWR) in a geographic information system (GIS). GWR was applied to present a spatial relation between flood risks and regeneration areas for dependent and independent variables in the four components. Then the new conceptual framework was overlaid as a flood risk map using risk indicators of the four components. The first three components were included in the GIS framework to map flood risk indices, whereas the community resilience component was subtracted from the total indices. Finally, the total number of indices of the flood risk map were divided into nine levels, from 0 to 8. Overall, the study shows the utility of the flood risk map, which is based on the spatial coincidence of mapping of the four components in a case study of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Areas with an index value of 8 on the flood risk map had the highest flood risks, which points to where there is a need for regeneration to improve flood defences and resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 482
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New social directions in UK flood risk management: moving towards flood risk citizenship?
    Nye, M.
    Tapsell, S.
    Twigger-Ross, C.
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 4 (04): : 288 - 297
  • [22] Improved urban flood risk assessment based on spontaneous-triggered risk assessment conceptual model considering road environment
    Ma, Chao
    Chen, Zifan
    Zhao, Kai
    Xu, Hongshi
    Qi, Wenchao
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 608
  • [23] A systematic review on approaches and methods used for flood vulnerability assessment: framework for future research
    Rehman, Sufia
    Sahana, Mehebub
    Hong, Haoyuan
    Sajjad, Haroon
    Ahmed, Baharin Bin
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 96 (02) : 975 - 998
  • [24] Progress in flood risk assessment at regional scale
    Chen Hao-rui
    Wang Shao-li
    2013 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL MANUFACTURING AND AUTOMATION (ICDMA), 2013, : 952 - +
  • [25] Urban flood risk assessment characterizing the relationship among hazard, exposure, and vulnerability
    Bin, Lingling
    Xu, Kui
    Pan, Hao
    Zhuang, Yunchao
    Shen, Ruozhu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (36) : 86463 - 86477
  • [26] ASSESSMENT OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AIR QUALITY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS IN SHEFFIELD, UK USING GIS
    Xie, Hui
    Hou, Shujing
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2010, 19 (9B): : 2040 - 2046
  • [27] Rainstorm flash flood risk assessment using genetic programming: a case study of risk zoning in Beijing
    Hu, HaiBo
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2016, 83 (01) : 485 - 500
  • [28] A Framework for Flood Risk Analysis and Benefit Assessment of Flood Control Measures in Urban Areas
    Li, Chaochao
    Cheng, Xiaotao
    Li, Na
    Du, Xiaohe
    Yu, Qian
    Kan, Guangyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (08)
  • [29] The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment
    Manzini, Riccardo
    Accorsi, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2013, 115 (02) : 251 - 263
  • [30] Top-down assessment of disaster resilience: A conceptual framework using coping and adaptive capacities
    Parsons, Melissa
    Glavac, Sonya
    Hastings, Peter
    Marshall, Graham
    McGregor, James
    McNeill, Judith
    Morley, Phil
    Reeve, Ian
    Stayner, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2016, 19 : 1 - 11