Most Preschoolers Don't Know Most

被引:6
作者
Sullivan, Jessica [1 ]
Bale, Alan [2 ]
Barner, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Skidmore Coll, Dept Psychol, 815 N Broadway, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 USA
[2] Concordia Univ, Linguist Program, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
LARGE-NUMBER DISCRIMINATION; ACQUISITION; LANGUAGE; WORDS; COMPREHENSION; QUANTIFIERS; MORPHOLOGY; SEMANTICS; ENGLISH; LESS;
D O I
10.1080/15475441.2018.1489813
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Recently, researchers interested in the nature and origins of semantic representations have investigated an especially informative case study: The acquisition of the word most-a quantifier which by all accounts demands a sophisticated second-order logic, and which therefore poses an interesting challenge to theories of language acquisition. According to some reports, children acquire most as early as three years of age, suggesting that it does not draw on cardinal representations of quantity (contrary to some formal accounts), since adult-like knowledge of counting emerges later in development. Other studies, however, have provided evidence that children acquire most much later-possibly by the age of 6 or 7-thereby drawing this logic into question. Here we explore this issue by conducting a series of experiments that probed children's knowledge of most in different ways. We conclude that children do not acquire an adult-like meaning for most until very late in development-around the age of 6-and that certain behaviors which appear consistent with earlier knowledge are better explained by children's well-attested bias to select larger sets (a "more" bias), especially when tested with unfamiliar words.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 338
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings [J].
Almoammer, Alhanouf ;
Sullivan, Jessica ;
Donlan, Chris ;
Marusic, Franc ;
Zaucer, Rok ;
O'Donnell, Timothy ;
Barner, David .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (46) :18448-18453
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1969, Number Words and Number Symbols: A Cultural History of Numbers
[3]   Finding one's meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development [J].
Barner, David ;
Chow, Katherine ;
Yang, Shu-Ju .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 58 (02) :195-219
[4]   Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese [J].
Barner, David ;
Libenson, Amanda ;
Cheung, Pierina ;
Takasaki, Mayu .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 103 (04) :421-440
[5]   GENERALIZED QUANTIFIERS AND NATURAL-LANGUAGE [J].
BARWISE, J ;
COOPER, R .
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 1981, 4 (02) :159-219
[6]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[7]   What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? [J].
Brooks, PJ ;
Braine, MDS .
COGNITION, 1996, 60 (03) :235-268
[8]   Acquiring the meaning of free relative clauses and plural definite descriptions [J].
Caponigro, Ivano ;
Pearl, Lisa ;
Brooks, Neon ;
Barner, David .
JOURNAL OF SEMANTICS, 2012, 29 (02) :261-293
[9]  
Carey S., 1978, RECENT ADV PSYCHOL L, P109
[10]   NON-LINGUISTIC STRATEGIES AND ACQUISITION OF WORD MEANINGS [J].
CLARK, EV .
COGNITION, 1973, 2 (02) :161-182