Capital investment requirements for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in power generation on near term to century time scales and global to regional spatial scales

被引:15
作者
Chaturvedi, Vaibhav [1 ]
Clarke, Leon [1 ]
Edmonds, James [1 ]
Calvin, Katherine [1 ]
Kyle, Page [1 ]
机构
[1] Joint Global Change Res Inst, College Pk, MD USA
关键词
Integrated assessment modeling; Capital investment; Electricity generation; Energy scenarios; Climate policy; BUILDING ENERGY DEMAND; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Our paper explores the implication of climate mitigation policy and electricity generation technology performance for capital investment demands by the electric power sector on near term to century time scales. We find that stabilizing GHG emissions will require additional investment in the electricity generation sector over and above investments that would be needed in the absence of climate policy, in the range of 15 to 29 trillion US$ (48-94%) depending on the stringency of climate policy during the period 2015 to 2095 under default technology assumptions. This increase reflects the higher capital intensity of power systems that control emissions as well as increased electrification of the global economy. Limits on the penetration of nuclear and carbon capture and storage technology could increase costs substantially. Energy efficiency improvements can reduce the investment requirement by 18 to 24 trillion US$ (compared to default technology climate policy assumptions), depending on climate policy scenario. We also highlight the implications of different technology evolution scenarios for different regions. Under default technology set, the heaviest investments across scenarios in power generation were observed in China, India, SE Asia and Africa regions with the latter three regions dominating in the second half of the 21st century. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 278
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Potential for reducing global carbon emissions from electricity production-A benchmarking analysis [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Zhou, P. ;
Tay, L. P. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2482-2489
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Annual Energy Outlook
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Annual Energy Outlook
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SCENARIOS GREENHOUSE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EN TECHN COST PERF D
[6]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTION WORKING
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ANN EN OUTL
[8]  
[Anonymous], INV FIN FLOWS ADD CL
[9]   Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targets [J].
Calvin, Katherine ;
Wise, Marshall ;
Kyle, Page ;
Patel, Pralit ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Edmonds, Jae .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) :691-704
[10]   2.6: Limiting, climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century [J].
Calvin, Katherine ;
Edmonds, James ;
Bond-Lamberty, Ben ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Kim, Son H. ;
Kyle, Page ;
Smith, Steven J. ;
Thomson, Allison ;
Wise, Marshall .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 :S107-S120