Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT)

被引:3
作者
Pal, Abhijit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stapleton, Sarah [2 ]
Yap, Christina [4 ,5 ]
Lai-Kwon, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Daly, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Magkos, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Baikady, Bindumalini Rao [1 ,2 ]
Minchom, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Banerji, Udai [1 ,2 ]
De Bono, Johann [1 ,2 ]
Karikios, Deme [3 ]
Boyle, Frances [3 ]
Lopez, Juanita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp Sutton, Drug Dev Unit, London, England
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Birmingham, Canc Res UK, Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Clin Trials & Stat Unit, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
QUALITY; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Early phase cancer clinical trials have become increasingly complicated in terms of patient selection and trial procedures-this is reflected in the increasing length of participant information sheets (PIS). Informed consent for early phase clinical trials has been contentious clue to the potential ethical issues associated with performing experimental research on a terminally ill population which has exhausted standard treatment options. Empirical studies have demonstrated significant gaps in patient understanding regarding the nature and intent of these trials. This study aims to test whether enhanced informed consent for patient education can improve patient scores on a validated questionnaire testing clinical trial comprehension. Methods and analysis This is a randomised controlled trial that will allocate patients who are eligible to participate in one of four investigator-initiated clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit to either a standard arm or an experimental arm, stratified by age and educational level. The standard arm will involve the full length trial PIS, followed by electronic or paper administration of the Quality of Informed Consent Questionnaire Parts A and B (QuIC-A and QuIC-B). The experimental arm will involve the full length trial PIS, exposure to a two-page study aid and 10 online educational videos, followed by administration of the QuIC-A and QuIC-B. The primary endpoint will be the difference (using a one-sided two-sample t-test) in the QuIC-A score, which measures objective understanding, between the standard and experimental arm. Accrual target is at least 17 patients per arm to detect an 8 point difference (80% power, alpha 0.05). Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was granted by the National Health Service Health Research Authority on 15 June 2020-IRAS Project ID 277065, Protocol Number CCR5165, REC Reference 20/EE/0155. Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] The Informed Consent in developing countries is truly autonomous? A descriptive study of participants in a helmintiasis clinical trial
    Lobato, Lucas
    Flavia Gazzinelli, Maria
    [J]. ACTA BIOETHICA, 2015, 21 (01): : 127 - 136
  • [32] Fragmented understanding: exploring the practice and meaning of informed consent in clinical trials in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Nguyen, Yen Hong Thi
    Dang, Thuan Trong
    Lam, Ngoc Bao Hong
    Le, Phuong Thanh
    Nguyen, Phu Hoan
    Bull, Susan
    Kestelyn, Evelyne
    Van Nuil, Jennifer Ilo
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [33] Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nguyen Thanh Tam
    Nguyen Tien Huy
    Le Thi Bich Thoa
    Nguyen Phuoc Long
    Nguyen Thi Huyen Trang
    Hirayama, Kenji
    Karbwang, Juntra
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2015, 93 (03) : 186 - U159
  • [34] Making a decision about trial participation: the feasibility of measuring deliberation during the informed consent process for clinical trials
    Gillies, Katie
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Cook, Jonathan
    [J]. TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [35] Participants' understanding of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) through informed consent procedures in the RCT for breast cancer screening, J-START
    Shiono, Yoko Narikawa
    Zheng, Ying-Fang
    Kikuya, Masahiro
    Kawai, Masaaki
    Ishida, Takanori
    Kuriyama, Shinichi
    Ohuchi, Noriaki
    [J]. TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [36] It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: Opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials
    Wade, Julia
    Donovan, Jenny L.
    Lane, J. Athene
    Neal, David E.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 68 (11) : 2018 - 2028
  • [37] Piloting a tool for informed consent comprehension in a cardiovascular clinical trial in South Africa: An IMPI-2 pilot trial substudy (ICC Study)
    Isiguzo, G. C.
    Familusi, M. A.
    Sliwa, K.
    Thabane, L.
    Ntsekhe, M.
    Mayosi, B. M.
    de Vries, J.
    [J]. SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 113 (3B): : 1095 - 1103
  • [38] Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Benoit, Alexandra
    Grynberg, Michael
    Morello, Remy
    Sermondade, Nathalie
    Grandazzi, Guillaume
    Moutel, Gregoire
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):