Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT)

被引:3
|
作者
Pal, Abhijit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stapleton, Sarah [2 ]
Yap, Christina [4 ,5 ]
Lai-Kwon, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Daly, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Magkos, Dimitrios [1 ,2 ]
Baikady, Bindumalini Rao [1 ,2 ]
Minchom, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Banerji, Udai [1 ,2 ]
De Bono, Johann [1 ,2 ]
Karikios, Deme [3 ]
Boyle, Frances [3 ]
Lopez, Juanita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp Sutton, Drug Dev Unit, London, England
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Birmingham, Canc Res UK, Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Clin Trials & Stat Unit, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
QUALITY; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Early phase cancer clinical trials have become increasingly complicated in terms of patient selection and trial procedures-this is reflected in the increasing length of participant information sheets (PIS). Informed consent for early phase clinical trials has been contentious clue to the potential ethical issues associated with performing experimental research on a terminally ill population which has exhausted standard treatment options. Empirical studies have demonstrated significant gaps in patient understanding regarding the nature and intent of these trials. This study aims to test whether enhanced informed consent for patient education can improve patient scores on a validated questionnaire testing clinical trial comprehension. Methods and analysis This is a randomised controlled trial that will allocate patients who are eligible to participate in one of four investigator-initiated clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit to either a standard arm or an experimental arm, stratified by age and educational level. The standard arm will involve the full length trial PIS, followed by electronic or paper administration of the Quality of Informed Consent Questionnaire Parts A and B (QuIC-A and QuIC-B). The experimental arm will involve the full length trial PIS, exposure to a two-page study aid and 10 online educational videos, followed by administration of the QuIC-A and QuIC-B. The primary endpoint will be the difference (using a one-sided two-sample t-test) in the QuIC-A score, which measures objective understanding, between the standard and experimental arm. Accrual target is at least 17 patients per arm to detect an 8 point difference (80% power, alpha 0.05). Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was granted by the National Health Service Health Research Authority on 15 June 2020-IRAS Project ID 277065, Protocol Number CCR5165, REC Reference 20/EE/0155. Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure
    Bergenmar, Mia
    Johansson, Hemming
    Wilking, Nils
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 8 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [22] Randomised controlled trial of whether erotic material is required for semen collection: impact of informed consent on outcome
    Handelsman, D. J.
    Sivananathan, T.
    Andres, L.
    Bathur, F.
    Jayadev, V.
    Conway, A. J.
    ANDROLOGY, 2013, 1 (06) : 943 - 947
  • [23] Improving Participant Understanding of Informed Consent in an HIV-Prevention Clinical Trial: A Comparison of Methods
    Corneli, Amy L.
    Sorenson, James R.
    Bentley, Margaret E.
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Bowling, J. Michael
    Nkhoma, Jacqueline
    Moses, Agnes
    Zulu, Cynthia
    Chilima, James
    Ahmed, Yusuf
    Heilig, Charles M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    van der Horst, Charles
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2012, 16 (02) : 412 - 421
  • [24] Seeking informed consent to Phase I cancer clinical trials: identifying oncologists' communication strategies
    Brown, Richard
    Bylund, Carma L.
    Siminoff, Laura A.
    Slovin, Susan F.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 20 (04) : 361 - 368
  • [25] Parental comprehension and satisfaction in informed consent in paediatric clinical trials: a prospective study on childhood leukaemia
    Chappuy, H.
    Baruchel, A.
    Leverger, G.
    Oudot, C.
    Brethon, B.
    Haouy, S.
    Auvrignon, A.
    Davous, D.
    Doz, F.
    Treluyer, J. M.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2010, 95 (10) : 800 - 804
  • [26] Assessment of the quality of patient information sheets and informed consent forms for clinical trials at a hospital neurology service
    Jaramillo Velez, A. G.
    Aguas Compaired, M.
    Granados Plaza, M.
    Marino, E. L.
    Modamio, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 27 (10) : 1825 - 1831
  • [27] A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: Feasibility, approach, and results
    Kass, Nancy E.
    Taylor, Holly A.
    Ali, Joseph
    Hallez, Kristina
    Chaisson, Lelia
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (01) : 54 - 66
  • [28] Practical communication guidance to improve phase 1 informed consent conversations and decision-making in pediatric oncology
    Johnson, Liza-Marie
    Leek, Angela C.
    Drotar, Dennis
    Noll, Robert B.
    Rheingold, Susan R.
    Kodish, Eric D.
    Baker, Justin N.
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (14) : 2439 - 2448
  • [29] Internet based patient education improves informed consent for elective orthopaedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Fraval, Andrew
    Chandrananth, Janan
    Chong, Yew M.
    Phong Tran
    Coventry, Lillian S.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [30] Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Phase II-IV Clinical Trials in China
    Wen, Gaiyan
    Lui, Xinchun
    Huang, Lihua
    Shu, Jingxian
    Xu, Nana
    Chen, Ruifang
    Huang, Zhijun
    Yang, Guoping
    Wang, Xiaomin
    Xiang, Yuxia
    Lu, Yao
    Yuan, Hong
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):