PM2.5 volatility prediction by XGBoost-MLP based on GARCH models

被引:70
|
作者
Dai, Hongbin [1 ]
Huang, Guangqiu [1 ]
Zeng, Huibin [1 ]
Zhou, Fangyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, Xian 710055, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Int Studies Univ, Sch Appl English, Chengdu Inst, Chengdu 611844, Peoples R China
关键词
PM2.5; Volatility prediction; GARCH model; MLP; XGBoost; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-POLLUTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131898
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent, air pollution has a sever impact on public health and economy development throughout the world. Air pollution consists of a variety of harming components, of which fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is considered to be one of the causes of health concerns. Under this circumstance, accurate prediction of atmospheric pollutant concentrations has become a hot research hotspot in the academic field of environment. The frequent changes of different factors cause random fluctuations in the concentration of PM2.5, which brings difficulties to the control of the concentration of air pollutants. By predicting concentration values within different areas and understanding the changes about PM2.5 concentrations, we can effectively warn and take actions to fluctuations in PM2.5 concentrations and help environment policy decision-makers provide sufficient information to guide their decisions. A hybrid model combining XGBoost, four GARCH models and MLP model(XGBoost-GARCH-MLP)is proposed to predict PM2.5 concentration values and volatility. The experimental research results show that the volatility forecasting model proposed in this study has good performance in the long-term forecasting process. If the volatility is used as the PM2.5 concentration prediction benchmark, a better prediction result will be obtained. In conclusion, the model established in this study can more effectively predict PM2.5 concentrations and fluctuations in different regions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of PM2.5 Concentration Using Spatiotemporal Data with Machine Learning Models
    Ma, Xin
    Chen, Tengfei
    Ge, Rubing
    Xv, Fan
    Cui, Caocao
    Li, Junpeng
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (10)
  • [22] The MR-CA Models for Analysis of Pollution Sources and Prediction of PM2.5
    Deng, Fang
    Ma, Liqiu
    Gao, Xin
    Chen, Jie
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2019, 49 (04): : 814 - 820
  • [23] A novel hybrid-Garch model based on ARIMA and SVM for PM2.5 concentrations forecasting
    Wang, Ping
    Zhang, Hong
    Qin, Zuodong
    Zhang, Guisheng
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 8 (05) : 850 - 860
  • [24] STFformer: An Effective PM2.5 Prediction Model
    Zhang, Guangpei
    Niu, Dan
    Wang, Hongbin
    Tang, Yuanqing
    Zang, Zengliang
    Huang, Qunbo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC 2024, 2024, : 5131 - 5136
  • [25] The Volatility and Density Prediction Performance of Alternative GARCH Models
    Huang, Teng-Hao
    Wang, Yaw-Huei
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2012, 31 (02) : 157 - 171
  • [26] Does PM10 influence the prediction of PM2.5?
    Choudhary, Rashmi
    Agarwal, Amit
    2022 SMART CITIES SYMPOSIUM PRAGUE (SCSP), 2022,
  • [27] ESG Volatility Prediction Using GARCH and LSTM Models
    Mishra, Akshay Kumar
    Kumar, Rahul
    Bal, Debi Prasad
    FINANCIAL INTERNET QUARTERLY, 2023, 19 (04) : 97 - 114
  • [28] Constructing PM2.5 Map based on Mobile PM2.5 Sensor and Cloud platform
    Lin, Yung-Sheng
    Chang, Yu-Hsiang
    Chang, Yue-Shan
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (CIT), 2016, : 702 - 707
  • [29] Evaluation of gap-filling approaches in satellite-based daily PM2.5 prediction models
    Xiao, Qingyang
    Geng, Guannan
    Cheng, Jing
    Liang, Fengchao
    Li, Rui
    Meng, Xia
    Xue, Tao
    Huang, Xiaomeng
    Kan, Haidong
    Zhang, Qiang
    He, Kebin
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 244
  • [30] Highly Efficient Picture-Based Prediction of PM2.5 Concentration
    Gu, Ke
    Qiao, Junfei
    Li, Xiaoli
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2019, 66 (04) : 3176 - 3184