Study on the Influencing Factors of Short Video Users' Subjective Well-Being

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jiajing [1 ]
Bai, Jie [1 ]
Li, Ziying [1 ]
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Lei, Xiuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
BRAIN INFORMATICS, BI 2021 | 2021年 / 12960卷
关键词
Short video users; Use of mobile social-media; Boredom proneness; Time management proneness; Subjective well-being/SWB; FACEBOOK; USAGE;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_19
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
As one of the types of mobile social media, short video has a huge number of users in China, which is over 873 million, accounting for 88.3% of the total number of Internet users by December 2020. The purpose of this study is to understand the emotional and psychological state of users in process of using short video and improve the subjective well-being level of the users. Methods: The Study conducted in-depth interviews with 12 short video users to explore the factors that affect the subjective well-being of short video users. Results: (1) The influential factors affecting the subjective well-being of short video users in the process of using social media usage were information overload and social pressure in environmental factors; physical condition, emotional state, aesthetic fatigue, social comparison, fear of missing out, self-expectation and self-control in personal factors; passive use and diving factors in behavioral factors; (2) It was further generalized that boredom proneness and time management proneness are the two most important factors that affect users' subjective well-being. Conclusion: The most important factors influencing the subjective well-being of short video users are boredom proneness and time management proneness.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 210
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Virtual Arena: A Call for a New Domain of Child Subjective Well-Being
    Nadan, Yochay
    Kaye-Tzadok, Avital
    CHILD INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (02) : 461 - 477
  • [32] Are Most People Happy? Exploring the Meaning of Subjective Well-Being Ratings
    Ponocny, I.
    Weismayer, Ch.
    Stross, B.
    Dressler, S. G.
    JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2016, 17 (06) : 2635 - 2653
  • [33] Psychological Predictors and Mediators of Subjective Well-being in a Sample of Romanian Teachers
    Stanculescu, Elena
    REVISTA DE CERCETARE SI INTERVENTIE SOCIALA, 2014, 46 : 37 - 52
  • [34] An Exploratory Analysis of a Subjective Well-Being Model for Chinese University Students
    Dong Xiaoxi
    Dibello, Lilia C.
    Turegun, Mehmet
    Ban, Ruth A.
    FRONTIERS OF EDUCATION IN CHINA, 2020, 15 (03) : 403 - 421
  • [35] Applying Positive Psychology’s Subjective Well-Being to Online Interactions
    Delellis, Nicole S.
    Kelly D.
    Liu Y.
    Mayhew A.
    Chen Y.
    Cornwell, Sarah E.
    Rubin, Victoria L.
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, 59 (01) : 662 - 665
  • [36] Are Most People Happy? Exploring the Meaning of Subjective Well-Being Ratings
    I. Ponocny
    Ch. Weismayer
    B. Stross
    S. G. Dressler
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016, 17 : 2635 - 2653
  • [37] Does Facebook use influence users' psychological well-being (PWB)? A literature review on trends and psychological well-being effects of Facebook use
    Astatke, Melese
    Weng, Cathy
    Chen, Hsuan
    UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2024, 23 (01) : 141 - 153
  • [38] Does Facebook use influence users’ psychological well-being (PWB)? A literature review on trends and psychological well-being effects of Facebook use
    Melese Astatke
    Cathy Weng
    Hsuan Chen
    Universal Access in the Information Society, 2024, 23 : 141 - 153
  • [39] Early Child-care Arrangements and Both Parents' Subjective Well-being
    Ryser, Valerie-Anne
    Heers, Marieke
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2023, 32 (04) : 1002 - 1017
  • [40] Online Networks and Subjective Well-Being: The Effect of "Big Five Personality Traits"
    Requena, Felix
    Ayuso, Luis
    SOCIAL INCLUSION, 2021, 9 (04) : 399 - 412