Productivity improvement and multiple management controls: evidence from a manufacturing firm

被引:4
|
作者
Guldenpfennig, Michael [1 ]
Hald, Kim Sundtoft [1 ]
Hansen, Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Management control systems; Productivity; Manufacturing;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-09-2020-0667
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The present paper explores the multiple management control systems (MCSs) involved in productivity improvement (PI) in manufacturing and how they interrelate. Research has largely neglected the multiplicity and interrelationships of these MCSs. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on an abductive case study approach, the authors collected empirical data from a global automotive supplier that produces complex systems for passenger cars. Recent PI activities are analysed to identify and explain the interrelationships among the multiple MCSs affecting these activities. Findings The study shows how a broad range of MCSs are involved in PI. The study identifies and explores both complementary and conflicting relationships among the MCSs and demonstrates how managers rely on a set of mechanisms to alleviate tensions and strengthen complementarities among these MCSs. Research limitations/implications As this paper is based on a single case study, future research can contribute further generalisations (analytical and statistical) with respect to the MCSs involved in PI, how they are interrelated and which mechanisms managers use to manage their interrelationships. Practical implications Managers seeking to control and improve productivity should consider the complete control package and its interrelationships instead of focussing on each MCS separately. Originality/value The present paper contributes to the knowledge of the multiplicity and interrelationships of MCSs involved in PI and the type of managerial work required to manage their interrelationships.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1017
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corruption and Productivity: Firm-level Evidence
    De Rosa, Donato
    Gooroochurn, Nishaal
    Goerg, Holger
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2015, 235 (02): : 115 - 138
  • [42] Agglomeration and productivity in China: Firm level evidence
    Hu, Cui
    Xu, Zhaoyuan
    Yashiro, Naomitsu
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 33 : 50 - 66
  • [43] Exporting and firm productivity: evidence for Egypt and Morocco
    Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada
    MIDDLE EAST DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 12 (01) : 84 - 100
  • [44] The effect of innovation on productivity: evidence from Turkish manufacturing firms
    Fazlioglu, Burcu
    Dalgic, Basak
    Yereli, Ahmet Burcin
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (04) : 439 - 460
  • [45] Dynamics of investment and firm performance: comparative evidence from manufacturing industries
    Grazzi, Marco
    Jacoby, Nadia
    Treibich, Tania
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 51 (01) : 125 - 179
  • [46] Digitalization and Firm Value: The Evidence from China's Manufacturing Enterprises
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Jiao
    Lu, Yang
    Ji, Feng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [47] Offsite Manufacturing in the Construction Industry for Productivity Improvement
    Durdyev, Serdar
    Ismail, Syuhaida
    ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (01) : 35 - 46
  • [48] Drivers of firm growth: micro-evidence from Indian manufacturing
    Mathew, Nanditha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2017, 27 (03) : 585 - 611
  • [49] Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms
    Yasin, Mohammad Zeqi
    Esquivias, Miguel Angel
    Suyanto, Suyanto
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2021, 41 (04): : 2401 - 2417
  • [50] Does Export Destination Affect Firm Productivity? Evidence From Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Vietnamese Manufacturing Sector
    Vo, Diem Thi Hong
    Sun, Sizhong
    Phan, Chung Thanh
    GLOBAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 49 (01) : 23 - 42