Productivity improvement and multiple management controls: evidence from a manufacturing firm

被引:5
作者
Guldenpfennig, Michael [1 ]
Hald, Kim Sundtoft [1 ]
Hansen, Allan [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Operat Management, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Management control systems; Productivity; Manufacturing;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-09-2020-0667
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The present paper explores the multiple management control systems (MCSs) involved in productivity improvement (PI) in manufacturing and how they interrelate. Research has largely neglected the multiplicity and interrelationships of these MCSs. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on an abductive case study approach, the authors collected empirical data from a global automotive supplier that produces complex systems for passenger cars. Recent PI activities are analysed to identify and explain the interrelationships among the multiple MCSs affecting these activities. Findings The study shows how a broad range of MCSs are involved in PI. The study identifies and explores both complementary and conflicting relationships among the MCSs and demonstrates how managers rely on a set of mechanisms to alleviate tensions and strengthen complementarities among these MCSs. Research limitations/implications As this paper is based on a single case study, future research can contribute further generalisations (analytical and statistical) with respect to the MCSs involved in PI, how they are interrelated and which mechanisms managers use to manage their interrelationships. Practical implications Managers seeking to control and improve productivity should consider the complete control package and its interrelationships instead of focussing on each MCS separately. Originality/value The present paper contributes to the knowledge of the multiplicity and interrelationships of MCSs involved in PI and the type of managerial work required to manage their interrelationships.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 1017
页数:27
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
Gerhart B., 2020, Compensation
[22]   Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues [J].
Grabner, Isabella ;
Moers, Frank .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2013, 38 (6-7) :407-419
[23]   Improving operations performance in a small company: a case study [J].
Gunasekaran, A ;
Forker, L ;
Kobu, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (3-4) :316-335
[24]  
Hald K.S, 2019, P 26 INT ANN EUROMA, P2396
[25]   Defining and measuring alignment in performance management [J].
Hanson, John D. ;
Melnyk, Steven A. ;
Calantone, Roger A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (9-10) :1089-1114
[26]  
Hernes G., 1998, SOCIAL MECH ANAL APP
[27]   A bottom-up approach for productivity measurement and improvement [J].
Jagoda, Kalinga ;
Lonseth, Robert ;
Lonseth, Adam .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 62 (04) :387-406
[28]   Research issues and trends in industrial productivity over 44 years [J].
Jin, Jong Beom ;
Leem, Choon Seong ;
Lee, Choong Hyun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (05) :1273-1284
[29]   Managing the tension between performance measurement and strategy: coping strategies [J].
Johnston, Robert ;
Pongatichat, Panupak .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (9-10) :941-967
[30]  
KAPLAN RS, 1992, HARVARD BUS REV, V70, P71