A framework for the evaluation and selection of shoreline surface washing agents in oil spill response

被引:21
作者
Bi, Huifang [1 ]
An, Chunjiang [1 ]
Owens, Edward [2 ]
Lee, Kenneth [3 ]
Chen, Zhi [1 ]
Mulligan, Catherine [1 ]
Taylor, Elliott [4 ]
Boufadel, Michel [5 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Owens Coastal Consultants, Bainbridge Isl, WA 98110 USA
[3] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Ecosyst Sci, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E6, Canada
[4] Polaris Appl Sci Inc, Bainbridge Isl, WA 98110 USA
[5] New Jersey Inst Technol, Ctr Nat Resources Dev & Protect, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Oil spill; Shoreline; Surface washing agents; Decision making; MCDA; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; MARKAZI PROVINCE; TOPSIS; PROMETHEE; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112346
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The shorelines frequently suffer adverse impacts from oil spill accidents. As one important technique of shoreline cleanup, the application of surface washing agents (SWAs) can help achieve high oil removal from shoreline substrates with less damage to affected zone. In this study, a framework for evaluation and selection of SWAs in oil spill incidents was constructed to better understand and apply this technique. A decision tree was firstly developed to illustrate all possible scenarios which are appropriate to use SWAs in consideration of oil collectability, shoreline character, types and amount of stranded oil, and cleanup requirement. Based on literature review, theoretical modeling, and experts? suggestions, an integrated multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method was then come up to select the most preferred SWA from five aspects of toxicity, effectiveness, minimal dispersion, demonstrated field test, and cost. Its suitability and rationality were proved by a hypothetical case. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the weight of each criterion independently to check the priority rank of alternatives, and it also verified the robustness and stability of this model. The presented framework has significant implications for future research and application of SWAs in the shoreline cleanup.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Abdullah Lazim, 2019, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, V15, P271, DOI 10.1007/s40092-018-0289-z
[2]   Decision aiding model with entropy-based subjective utility [J].
Aggarwal, Manish .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 501 :558-572
[3]   A group-AHP decision analysis for the selection of applied fire protection to steel structures [J].
Akaa, Obinna Ukeni ;
Abu, Anthony ;
Spearpoint, Michael ;
Giovinazzi, Sonia .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2016, 86 :95-105
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Oil in the Sea III: Inputs, Fates, and Effects
[6]   A Life Cycle Based Air Quality Modeling and Decision Support System (LCAQMS) for Sustainable Mining Management [J].
Asif, Z. ;
Chen, Z. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 35 (02) :103-117
[7]   PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Kazemadeh, R. B. ;
Albadvi, A. ;
Aghdasi, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :198-215
[8]   Investigation into the oil removal from sand using a surface washing agent under different environmental conditions [J].
Bi, Huifang ;
An, Chunjiang ;
Chen, Xiujuan ;
Owens, Edward ;
Lee, Kenneth .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 275
[9]  
Buday C., 2012, P 31 AMOP TECHN SEM, P519
[10]   Oil-in-water emulsion breaking marine bacteria for demulsifying oily wastewater [J].
Cai, Qinhong ;
Zhu, Zhiwen ;
Chen, Bing ;
Zhang, Baiyu .
WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 149 :292-301