What service users with psychotic disorders want in a mental health crisis or relapse: thematic analysis of joint crisis plans

被引:46
作者
Farrelly, Simone [1 ]
Brown, Gill [2 ]
Rose, Diana [1 ]
Doherty, Elizabeth [1 ]
Henderson, R. Claire [1 ]
Birchwood, Max [3 ]
Marshall, Max [2 ]
Waheed, Waquas [4 ]
Szmukler, George [1 ]
Thornicroft, Graham [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sect Community Mental Hlth, Hlth Serv & Populat Res Dept, Inst Psychiat, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Med, Div Psychiat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Hlth & Wellbeing, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Choice; Shared decision making; Advance statements; Psychosis; Clinician-patient interaction; Crisis care; PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; REDUCE COMPULSORY TREATMENT; PEOPLE; CONSULTATIONS; EXPERIENCES; DECISIONS; OPINIONS; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00127-014-0869-1
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Recent legislation and guidance in England emphasises the importance of service user choice in care planning. However, it is not obvious how best to facilitate choices in care planning, and some clinicians are concerned that service users may make 'unwise' decisions. This study aimed to examine mental health service users' preferences and priorities in the event of a future mental health crisis or relapse. Thematic analysis of 221 joint crisis plans (JCP) developed by service users and their clinical team as part of the CRIMSON randomised controlled trial. Participants had a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, at least one psychiatric admission in the past 2 years, contact with a community mental health team, and complex care needs. Two major categories of preferences were identified: first the manner in which crisis care would be delivered; and second, specific treatment interventions. Most service users requested full involvement in decisions about their care, clear and consistent treatment plans, access to familiar clinicians who knew them well, and to be treated with respect and compassion. Some service users requested hospitalisation, but the majority preferred alternatives. The most frequently preferred intervention was care by a home treatment team. Just under half made a treatment refusal, the majority being for specific medications, alternatives were offered. Joint crisis planning resulted in service users making choices that were clinically reasonable. The technique employed by JCPs appeared to empower service users by engaging them in a productive dialogue with their clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1609 / 1617
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LIB NHS NO DEC ME ME
[2]  
Atkinson JM, 2004, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V39, P680
[3]   Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives [J].
Backlar, P ;
McFarland, BH ;
Swanson, JW ;
Mahler, J .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (06) :427-441
[4]  
Bogdanoski T, 2009, J LAW MED, V16, P891
[5]  
Borneo A, 2008, YOUR CHOICE RESULTS
[6]  
Boyatzis R. E., 1998, Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development
[7]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[8]   Individualisation in crisis planning for people with psychotic disorders [J].
Farrelly, S. ;
Szmukler, G. ;
Henderson, C. ;
Birchwood, M. ;
Marshall, M. ;
Waheed, W. ;
Finnecy, C. ;
Thornicroft, G. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2014, 23 (04) :353-359
[9]   Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations [J].
Goss, Claudia ;
Moretti, Francesca ;
Mazzi, Maria Angela ;
Del Piccolo, Lidia ;
Rimondini, Michela ;
Zimmermann, Christa .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 193 (05) :416-421
[10]  
Gould D., 2012, Service users' experiences of recovery under the 2008 care programme approach