A machine-learning benchmark for facies classification

被引:105
作者
Alaudah, Yazeed [1 ]
Michalowicz, Patrycja [2 ]
Alfarraj, Motaz [1 ]
Alregib, Ghassan [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Geo Proc CeGP, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Silesia, Fac Earth Sci, Katowice, Poland
来源
INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION | 2019年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
artificial intelligence; facies; faults; interpretation; stratigraphy;
D O I
10.1190/INT-2018-0249.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The recent interest in using deep learning for seismic interpretation tasks, such as fades classification, has been facing a significant obstacle, namely, the absence of large publicly available annotated data sets for training and testing models. As a result, researchers have often resorted to annotating their own training and testing data. However, different researchers may annotate different classes or use different train and test splits. In addition, it is common for papers that apply machine learning for facies classification to not contain quantitative results, and rather rely solely on visual inspection of the results. All of these practices have led to subjective results and have greatly hindered our ability to compare different machine-learning models against each other and understand the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. To address these issues, we open source a fully annotated 3D geologic model of the Netherlands F3 block. This model is based on study of the 3D seismic data in addition to 26 well logs, and it is grounded on the careful study of the geology of the region. Furthermore, we have developed two baseline models for facies classification based on a deconvolution network architecture and make their codes publicly available. Finally, we have developed a scheme for evaluating different models on this data set, and we have evaluated the results of our baseline models. In addition to making the data set and the code publicly available, our work helps advance research in this area by creating an objective benchmark for comparing the results of different machine-learning approaches for facies classification.
引用
收藏
页码:SE175 / SE187
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alaudah Y, 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, P2121, DOI 10.1190/segam2018-2997865.1.
[2]   Structure label prediction using similarity-based retrieval and weakly supervised label mapping [J].
Alaudah, Yazeed ;
Alfarraj, Motaz ;
AlRegib, Ghassan .
GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (01) :V67-V79
[3]  
Alaudah Y, 2016, IEEE IMAGE PROC, P4373, DOI 10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533186
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 79 ANN INT C EXH EAG, DOI DOI 10.3997/2214-4609.201700918
[5]  
Araya-Polo Mauricio, 2017, Leading Edge, V36, P208, DOI 10.1190/tle360300208.1
[6]  
Coleou T, 2003, Lead. Edge, V22, P942, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1623635
[7]   Unsupervised seismic facies analysis using wavelet transform and self-organizing maps [J].
de Matos, Marcilio Castro ;
Manassi Osorio, Paulo Leo ;
Schroeder Johann, Paulo Roberto .
GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (01) :P9-P21
[8]  
Di H., 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, pSEG, DOI [10.1190/segam2018-2997303.1, DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2018-2997303.1]
[9]  
Doornenbal J. C, 2014, PRZ GEOL, V62, P806
[10]  
Dramsch Jesper S., 2018, SEG Tech Program Expanded Abstracts 2036-2040, V2018, P2036, DOI [DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2018-2996783.1, 10.1190/segam2018-2996783.1]