Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: retrospective evaluation of 27 pregnancies in a tertiary center and comparison with previous studies

被引:18
作者
Tanacan, Atakan [1 ]
Fadiloglu, Erdem [1 ]
Ozten, Gonca [1 ]
Gunes, Ali Can [1 ]
Orgul, Gokcen [1 ]
Beksac, Mehmet Sinan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Perinatol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Acetylcholine receptors; Myasthenia gravis; Neuromuscular junction; Obstetric complications; Pregnancy; AUTOIMMUNE; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY; MOTHERS; FETAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11845-019-02029-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aim To share our experience with the management of pregnancies in women with myasthenia gravis (MG) in a tertiary center. Methods The study retrospectively evaluated 27 pregnancies in 12 patients. The pregnancies were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the clinical course of MG during pregnancy: improvement (n = 7), disease-stable (n = 9), and deterioration (n = 11). The groups were compared with respect to patient characteristics, clinical features, and obstetric outcomes. Results There were 4 miscarriages (14.8%), 3 preterm births (11.1%), and 4 cases of preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) (14.8%). Exacerbation was observed in 25.9% of the cases; the remission rate during the postpartum period and after miscarriage was 37%. The cesarean section (CS) rate was 78.3%. Pregnancies with deterioration of MG were statistically more likely to have higher miscarriage, preterm birth, PPROM, CS, and transient neonatal MG rates, in addition to a lower gestational age at birth, birth weight, and 5-min Apgar score than pregnancies with improved or stable disease (p values < 0.001, 0.04, 0.03, 0.009, 0.02, < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.043, respectively). Conclusion Physicians who manage pregnant women with MG must be familiar with the clinical features of the condition; a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for a better prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1267
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Immunosuppression in pregnancy - Choices for infant and maternal health
    Armenti, VT
    Moritz, MJ
    Cardonick, EH
    Davison, JM
    [J]. DRUGS, 2002, 62 (16) : 2361 - 2375
  • [2] Course and treatment of myasthenia gravis during pregnancy
    Batocchi, AP
    Majolini, L
    Evoli, A
    Lino, MM
    Minisci, C
    Tonali, P
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (03) : 447 - 452
  • [3] Beksac K, 2017, J CLIN DIAGN RES, V11, pQR1, DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24683.10900
  • [4] Beksaç K, 2017, J TURK-GER GYNECOL A, V18, P56, DOI 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0198
  • [5] Diagnostic and clinical classification of autoimmune myasthenia gravis
    Berrih-Aknin, Sonia
    Frenkian-Cuvelier, Melinee
    Eymard, Bruno
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY, 2014, 48-49 : 143 - 148
  • [6] MYASTHENIA GRAVIS IN PREGNANCY: EXPERIENCE OF A PORTUGUESE CENTER
    Braga, Antonio Costa
    Pinto, Clara
    Santos, Ernestina
    Braga, Jorge
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 54 (04) : 715 - 720
  • [7] A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis
    Carr, Aisling S.
    Cardwell, Chris R.
    McCarron, Peter O.
    McConville, John
    [J]. BMC NEUROLOGY, 2010, 10
  • [8] Cheng I., 2007, Acta Paediatrica Taiwanica, V48, P141
  • [9] Myasthenia gravis in pregnancy: report on 69 cases
    Djelmis, J
    Sostarko, M
    Mayer, D
    Ivanisevic, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 104 (01): : 21 - 25
  • [10] Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: A brief review of 37 pregnancies
    Ducci, R.
    Lorenzoni, P.
    Kay, C.
    Wemeck, L.
    Scola, R.
    [J]. NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2015, 25 : S207 - S207