Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: retrospective evaluation of 27 pregnancies in a tertiary center and comparison with previous studies

被引:18
作者
Tanacan, Atakan [1 ]
Fadiloglu, Erdem [1 ]
Ozten, Gonca [1 ]
Gunes, Ali Can [1 ]
Orgul, Gokcen [1 ]
Beksac, Mehmet Sinan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Perinatol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Acetylcholine receptors; Myasthenia gravis; Neuromuscular junction; Obstetric complications; Pregnancy; AUTOIMMUNE; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY; MOTHERS; FETAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11845-019-02029-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aim To share our experience with the management of pregnancies in women with myasthenia gravis (MG) in a tertiary center. Methods The study retrospectively evaluated 27 pregnancies in 12 patients. The pregnancies were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the clinical course of MG during pregnancy: improvement (n = 7), disease-stable (n = 9), and deterioration (n = 11). The groups were compared with respect to patient characteristics, clinical features, and obstetric outcomes. Results There were 4 miscarriages (14.8%), 3 preterm births (11.1%), and 4 cases of preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) (14.8%). Exacerbation was observed in 25.9% of the cases; the remission rate during the postpartum period and after miscarriage was 37%. The cesarean section (CS) rate was 78.3%. Pregnancies with deterioration of MG were statistically more likely to have higher miscarriage, preterm birth, PPROM, CS, and transient neonatal MG rates, in addition to a lower gestational age at birth, birth weight, and 5-min Apgar score than pregnancies with improved or stable disease (p values < 0.001, 0.04, 0.03, 0.009, 0.02, < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.043, respectively). Conclusion Physicians who manage pregnant women with MG must be familiar with the clinical features of the condition; a multidisciplinary approach is necessary for a better prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1267
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Immunosuppression in pregnancy - Choices for infant and maternal health [J].
Armenti, VT ;
Moritz, MJ ;
Cardonick, EH ;
Davison, JM .
DRUGS, 2002, 62 (16) :2361-2375
[2]   Course and treatment of myasthenia gravis during pregnancy [J].
Batocchi, AP ;
Majolini, L ;
Evoli, A ;
Lino, MM ;
Minisci, C ;
Tonali, P .
NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (03) :447-452
[3]  
Beksac K, 2017, J CLIN DIAGN RES, V11, pQR1, DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24683.10900
[4]  
Beksaç K, 2017, J TURK-GER GYNECOL A, V18, P56, DOI 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0198
[5]   Diagnostic and clinical classification of autoimmune myasthenia gravis [J].
Berrih-Aknin, Sonia ;
Frenkian-Cuvelier, Melinee ;
Eymard, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF AUTOIMMUNITY, 2014, 48-49 :143-148
[6]   MYASTHENIA GRAVIS IN PREGNANCY: EXPERIENCE OF A PORTUGUESE CENTER [J].
Braga, Antonio Costa ;
Pinto, Clara ;
Santos, Ernestina ;
Braga, Jorge .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 54 (04) :715-720
[7]   A systematic review of population based epidemiological studies in Myasthenia Gravis [J].
Carr, Aisling S. ;
Cardwell, Chris R. ;
McCarron, Peter O. ;
McConville, John .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2010, 10
[8]  
Cheng I., 2007, Acta Paediatrica Taiwanica, V48, P141
[9]   Myasthenia gravis in pregnancy: report on 69 cases [J].
Djelmis, J ;
Sostarko, M ;
Mayer, D ;
Ivanisevic, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 104 (01) :21-25
[10]   Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: A brief review of 37 pregnancies [J].
Ducci, R. ;
Lorenzoni, P. ;
Kay, C. ;
Wemeck, L. ;
Scola, R. .
NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2015, 25 :S207-S207