Interprofessional Collaboration in Long-Term Care and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

被引:37
作者
Doornebosch, Arno J. [1 ]
Smaling, Hanneke J. A. [1 ]
Achterberg, Wilco P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hippocratespad 21, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Interprofessional collaboration; interdisciplinary; long-term care; geriatric; rehabilitation; elderly; facilitators; barriers; HEALTH-CARE; INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM; RELATIONAL COORDINATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; NURSING-HOMES; MIXED-METHODS; PATIENT; MULTIMORBIDITY; PHYSICIANS; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.028
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine facilitators of and barriers to interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in institutional long-term care (LTC) and geriatric rehabilitation (GR), and to provide an overview of instruments used to assess IPC in LTC and GR. Design: Systematic integrative review. Setting and Participants: Institutional long-term care and geriatric rehabilitation. Methods: We systematically searched relevant databases for articles using the terms interprofessional collaboration, interdisciplinary, long-term care, geriatric rehabilitation, elderly, facilitators, and barriers. We conducted a systematic integrative review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis method. Papers containing empirical data about barriers to and facilitators of IPC in LTC and GR were included. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. Data were analyzed using qualitative thematical analysis. Results: Three interdependent themes regarding facilitators of and barriers to IPC emerged: Team performance, Organizational conditions, and Sharing information. Eight instruments were used to assess IPC in LTC and none for GR. Limited descriptions and insufficient psychometric qualities of the instruments were reported. Conclusions and Implications: To enhance IPC, it is necessary to stimulate facilitators and limit barriers on all 3 themes. Furthermore, a reliable, validated instrument to assess IPC in LTC and GR, based on a clear definition of IPC is needed. Successful IPC when caring for patients with multimorbidity in LTC and GR requires integration, understanding, and recognition of the interdependency from all persons involved, including patients and family caregivers. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews about interprofessional collaboration: facilitators, barriers, and outcomes
    Wei, Holly
    Horns, Phyllis
    Sears, Samuel F.
    Huang, Kun
    Smith, Christopher M.
    Wei, Trent L.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2022, 36 (05) : 735 - 749
  • [22] Interprofessional collaboration and the care and management of type 2 diabetic patients in the Middle East: A systematic review
    Johnson, J. M.
    Carragher, R.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2018, 32 (05) : 621 - 628
  • [23] Interprofessional collaboration for children with physical disabilities: a scoping review
    Styczen, Line Myrdal
    Helseth, Solvi
    Groven, Karen Synne
    Hauge, Mona-Iren
    Dahl-Michelsen, Tone
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2024,
  • [24] Interprofessional collaboration within fluid teams: Community nurses' experiences with palliative home care
    Mertens, Fien
    De Gendt, Anneleen
    Deveugele, Myriam
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Pype, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (19-20) : 3680 - 3690
  • [25] What are the differences among occupational groups related to their palliative care-specific educational needs and intensity of interprofessional collaboration in long-term care homes?
    Kaasalainen, S.
    Sussman, T.
    Bui, M.
    Akhtar-Danesh, N.
    Laporte, R. D.
    McCleary, L.
    Griffiths, A. Wickson
    Brazil, K.
    Parker, D.
    Dal Bello-Haas, V.
    Papaioannou, A.
    O'Leary, J.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2017, 16
  • [26] Individual and organizational factors of nurses' job satisfaction in long-term care: A systematic review
    Aloisio, Laura D.
    Coughlin, Mary
    Squires, Janet E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 123
  • [27] Medication issues in rehabilitation in long-term care
    Williams, RG
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 1999, 15 (02) : 22 - 33
  • [28] Barriers and facilitators to providing rehabilitation for long-term care residents with dementia: a qualitative study
    Ibekaku, Michael Chigozie
    Ripley, Sara
    Alizadehsaravi, Niousha
    Affoo, Rebecca
    Middleton, Laura E.
    Moody, Elaine
    Ghanouni, Parisa
    Weeks, Lori E.
    McArthur, Caitlin
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [29] A systematic review of the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in long-term care
    Donald, Faith
    Martin-Misener, Ruth
    Carter, Nancy
    Donald, Erin E.
    Kaasalainen, Sharon
    Wickson-Griffiths, Abigail
    Lloyd, Monique
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    DiCenso, Alba
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2013, 69 (10) : 2148 - 2161
  • [30] Rehabilitation in the long-term care insurance domain: a scoping review
    Shinohara, Hiroshi
    Mikami, Yukio
    Kuroda, Rumi
    Asaeda, Makoto
    Kawasaki, Takashi
    Kouda, Ken
    Nishimura, Yukihide
    Ohkawa, Hiroyuki
    Uenishi, Hiroyasu
    Shimokawa, Toshio
    Mikami, Yasuo
    Tajima, Fumihiro
    Kubo, Toshikazu
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 12 (01)