Impact of Valve Type (Ross vs. Mechanical) on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Young Adults with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Background The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) type on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents and young adults is unclear, but may vary depending on need for anticoagulation or re-intervention. We sought to determine the differences in HRQOL following AVR with either the Ross procedure or mechanical AVR in this young population. Methods Patients 14-35 years old and at least 1 year post-AVR were included. HRQOL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Valve-specific concerns regarding anticoagulation and reoperation were also assessed. Clinical outcome data were obtained by chart review. Results A total of 51 patients were enrolled: 24 (47%) Ross and 27 (53%) mechanical AVR. Ross patients were younger at time of AVR (16 vs. 22 years, p < 0.01) and study enrollment (23.7 vs 29.5 years, p < 0.01). Median follow-up from AVR to study enrollment was similar (5.4 years for Ross vs. 5.6 years for mechanical, p = 0.62). At last follow-up, clinical outcomes including cardiac function, functional class, and aortic valve re-intervention rates were similar between groups, although mechanical valve patients had more bleeding events (p = 0.012). SF-36 scores were generally high for the entire cohort, with no significant difference between groups in any domain. Mechanical AVR patients reported more concern about frequency of blood draws (p < 0.01). Concern for reoperation was similar between both groups. Conclusion Despite more bleeding events and concern about the frequency of blood draws, adolescents and young adults with mechanical AVR reported similarly high levels of HRQOL compared to those following Ross AVR.