The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study

被引:6
|
作者
Al-Bemani, AS [1 ]
Guo, BY
Ghalambor, A
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Al Khoud, Oman
[2] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Lafayette, LA USA
关键词
reservoir modeling; identification; well testing; transient; pressure derivative; multiple realizations; dual porosity; composite system; partial sealing; dual permeability; aquifer; interporosity;
D O I
10.1081/LFT-120017455
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Reservoir engineers are frequently faced with a very difficult question, thought to be a simple one, when attempting to analyze pressure transient test data. Correct model identification that can be used to analyze test data is ought to be a very simple exercise due to numerous analytical models, which are published in the literature. However, dealing with almost a black box situation "Underground Reservoir," it is still difficult today to identify a reservoir model that represents a particular test. In fact, the pressure derivative technique in identifying flow regimes that pressure behavior undergoes during the well testing has introduced another dimension and is considered to be an important step in analyzing pressure transient tests. However, the non-uniqueness in model responses, which produces similar pressure derivatives, hinders the engineers, and most often causes in taking a wrong decision. This study looks into non-unique model response, introduces a simplistic method using numerical simulator and any reservoir information available in eliminating non-realistic solutions. Analysis of actual well test data, to obtain the very basic properties, and integrating any other available data, one can build different model realizations. An actual model was build by history matching the pressure derivative that helped reducing the problem of non-uniqueness response.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 899
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BUILD-UP TEST ANALYSIS OF THE HORIZONTAL WELL
    Kolin, Sonja Koscak
    Cikes, Marin
    Babic, Valentina
    RUDARSKO-GEOLOSKO-NAFTNI ZBORNIK, 2013, 26 (01): : 11 - 27
  • [2] Study on Test Cycle of Build-Up Well Test in Low Permeability Reservoir
    Liu, Tongjing
    Jiang, Baoyi
    Liu, Rui
    Diwu, Pengxiang
    ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2012, 594-597 : 456 - +
  • [3] Geological interpretation of well test analysis: A case study from a fluvial reservoir in the Gulf of Thailand
    Zheng, SY
    Corbett, PWM
    Emery, A
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2003, 26 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [4] Effect of flow pressure on interpretation result of pressure build up test
    Qian' an Oil Extraction Factory, Jilin Oilfield
    不详
    Well Test., 2006, 5 (19-21+76):
  • [5] Automatic reservoir model identification using syntactic pattern recognition in well test interpretation
    Yang, Sihan
    Liu, Qiguo
    Li, Xiaoping
    Xu, Youjie
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 42 (08) : 993 - 1017
  • [6] Selecting a reservoir model for well test interpretation
    S.A. Holditch & Associates, College Station, United States
    Pet Eng Int, 12 (83, 85-88):
  • [7] Analysis of well YH106 well build up pressure data
    Bai, Qiuyan
    Tian, Xinjian
    Zhou, Bo
    Tang, Rusen
    Wu, Jian
    Well Testing, 2006, 15 (02) : 37 - 38
  • [8] Interpretation and the case study - The challenge of a relational approach
    Brown, Alison P.
    THEORETICAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2007, 11 (04) : 485 - 500
  • [9] Automated reservoir model selection in well-test interpretation
    Güyagüler, B
    Horne, RN
    Tauzin, E
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2003, 6 (02) : 100 - 107
  • [10] A study of well test data interpretation model for water-bearing reservoirs with phase redistribution
    Zhang, Junxiang
    Deng, Rui
    Liang, Haipeng
    Yang, Jing
    2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RESOURCE EXPLORATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (REES 2017), 2017, 64